Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (132073)	8/12/2005 8:58:05 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793820

That authorization specifically does not pre-empt the War Powers Resolution, which I read as requiring consultation with Congress before introducing US forces into a theater of operations unless there is an emergency. Authorization for Use of Force following Sept. 11 attacks. yale.edu War Powers Resolution. yale.edu No doubt Congress intended the powers of the President to be broad following the 9/11 attack. Now that we have a better understanding of the parameters of the actual enemy, I doubt Congress is willing to give even Bush continuing carte blanche for operations within the US. That's why the War Powers Resolution requires Presidents to continue to consult with Congress, so they can reel him in if need be.