SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (92140)8/14/2005 11:26:26 AM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
SHORT SELLING COMBINED WITH FRAUDULENT STOCK MANIPULATION

POSITION PAPER

August 12, 2005

advancedsmallbusiness.org

SHORT SELLING COMBINED WITH FRAUDULENT STOCK MANIPULATION

Submitted by Gregory J. Halpern – CEO, Circle Group Holdings, Inc. (CXN: AMEX)

Mr. Halpern is the Director of the Midwest Regional Chapter for the CEO Council

Small Business Hurdles
The millions of small business professionals that own and operate small companies in this country produce a majority of America's private gross domestic product, most of the taxable revenue to the treasury, and most of the new jobs every year. Between 1990 and 1995 they created 76 percent of America's new jobs. In 1998 alone, this sector created 31 million new jobs in nearly 900,000 new companies. And this trend is expected to continue. A crucial component of our domestic economic engine is the ability to create funding through access to the capital markets. Everyone who owns or runs a publicly traded small business knows the hurdles that they must overcome in order to make their business successful, including obtaining funding, completing all of the regulatory filings, competing for market share, and compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley with the outrageous cost burden it imposes, to name a few. Small public companies, and many others with the goal to get to the capital markets accept all of this, plus long hours, late nights, and weekends as what it takes to grow their business, improve the world with their products and services, and create wealth for themselves, their employees, their shareholders and the economy.


But small public companies and their shareholders are facing a severe problem, and they are looking to the Securities & Exchange Commission, the Justice Department, and the F.B.I. to help them get urgently needed relief. The problem is that short selling is being intentionally combined with fraudulent stock manipulation to destroy the value that small American businesses in the capital markets work so hard to achieve. The points contained in this position paper have tremendous merit for all small public companies but it must be pointed out that it was written with a bias because our company, Circle Group Holdings, has been under constant attack from a well-organized group of criminals for over a year and a half. Our management team and employees, who are all owners of the company’s stock, are tenacious, tough minded, fighters of injustice, with multi-faceted business experience and backgrounds in martial arts. Thanks to our intestinal fortitude learned from these backgrounds, we have survived the attacks, and fully expect to survive any additional attacks. From early 2004, until the present, Circle Group has successfully battled its attackers by getting several public web sites and chat boards to remove malicious phony content, getting a protective court order and winning motions on cutting edge Internet jurisdiction issues. We found out through this experience that one of our attackers is now a defendant in other securities matters and is currently being prosecuted by the SEC for another unrelated stock fraud. Tragically, many other small public companies have gone out of business. Still more will not survive the attacks or mount any serious defense against the perpetrators who work in hiding, often live and/or operate off shore, have completely phony identities and are cloaked by the anonymity of the Internet.


For additional perspective our company, Circle Group Holdings has a legitimate natural food technology solution for obesity called Z-Trim that was developed at the U.S. Department of Agriculture over many years with significant amount of taxpayer dollars. Many anonymous attacks have been made against the company and its personnel in particular saying that Z-Trim is a scam. Except for bashers, no one on the planet has even suggested that Z-Trim invented by one of the world’s most influential agricultural scientists, is a bad invention. Yet the bashers who attack the company, post numerous outrageous lies about Z-Trim. It is amazing that the number one health problem in the world today is obesity, and this outstanding technology could reverse the course of this devastating disease, yet here is this group of criminals posting lie after lie with their only goal to destroy the value of the company’s equity and shareholder value. Many innovations and inventions that could have benefited humankind will never get to market because of the companies that were destroyed by these criminals.


When just looking at approximately 5000 small and micro-cap companies that have an average issued and outstanding share total of 40 million shares, and multiplying that by an average $5 loss on share value, we estimate the losses to investors to be at least a trillion dollars annually. The number is probably a lot higher when you factor all the other companies attacked and then lost jobs, potential new economies of scale that never develop, lost capital markets formation, increased cost burdens on government and families to support those individuals wiped out, lost individual and corporate taxable revenue to the treasury, lost improvements to our lives from innovation that does not occur, and lost investor confidence in the emerging markets as well as erosion of the American Dream.

Therefore, the primary objective of this Position Paper is to provide valuable information and suggestions that if heeded, and if existing laws are enforced, will help countless companies and their shareholders avoid suffering this fate in the future. Without help, many companies will not survive, and many more will have their shareholders’ value severely damaged. The criminals who perpetrate the attacks being discussed here are bold, well organized economic terrorists who commit securities fraud daily, without punishment, and who benefit immensely from the technological advances of the Internet and the economics of regulatory authorities who are challenged to justify the cost of pursuing these crimes. After a miserable half decade in the capital markets, if the economy is to ever improve in a noticeable way, this problem must be fixed. While serving large corporations to better prevent rampant fraud exposed in recent times, Sarbanes has not served small business in any way to restore investor confidence in the market as evidenced by the lack of capital market investment and investors continued knee jerk reactions to nearly every piece of daily news. The good news is that the legal system in place, if utilized as suggested herein, already provides the ability to remove most of the current network of criminals from the capital markets and restore investor confidence, thereby stimulating many other areas of our economy.


The Growing Problem
Unscrupulous speculators have found ways to short stocks and then manipulate companies stock prices lower by continuously attacking the companies on Internet financial chat boards, websites, and through other highly illegal and unethical means. Agents for competitors or shareholders of competing companies’ stocks may also make these attacks for obvious reasons. The bloggers and bashers spend their days, nights, and weekends, viciously attacking the companies they short with continuous false disparaging chat board posts about the companies, their management, employees, products and investors. Some of these shorting syndicates and other bashing groups are well organized, but all have one goal in mind, posting defamatory negative false or distorted information in an effort to severely damage a company’s reputation and stock price. Some bashers also utilize so-called “watchdog” websites to attack companies, but only after alerting their subscribers that they are going to issue a negative report about a targeted company. This gives their subscribers the opportunity to get a solid short position before the attack begins, thus creating additional short or negative pressure on a stock. These activities constitute securities fraud.


One listed company sells a homeopathic medication to reduce the duration of the common cold. The company was attacked by a group that called for a class action suit for users of the product who suffered a loss of smell from using the product. A website posted this information encouraging people to contact them to discuss potential legal actions against the company. A Dow Jones newswire article reported on these so-called consumer complaints about the product and their loss of smell. The company has given assurances that it adheres to FDA guidelines and restrictions and was unaware of an FDA inquiry into the safety of their product. As a result of the group that attacked them and the news articles that followed, the company’s stock price began to drop, and kept dropping until their market cap was cut to less than half. The number of people who signed up to be a part of the class action suit against the company turned out to be only two, a husband and wife. They both claimed to have some loss of smell from using the product, but only after the website and news article came out. The stock recovered some of its huge drop once people realized that the claims made against the company weren’t what they first appeared to be. Unfortunately, the stock price has only gone up to a portion of what it lost, and the shareholders who lost in excess of several hundred million dollars are the ones who suffered as a result of this.


How They Operate
The criminals are short-selling bashers, and illegal stock manipulators, who repeatedly post outrageous known lies or distorted half-truths with a dogged determination and single-minded purpose – use any means possible to drive the stock price down.


In the small and micro cap market, most increases in value to a stock occur when more people buy more shares. Any such occurrence will automatically result in relentless postings that the company is a pump and dump scheme. The bashers will post as many as a dozen posts at a time under multiple aliases in order to dominate a chat board. On some message boards that give you the option, they continuously post under multiple aliases with a strong sell sentiment, even if they may only post about the weather or some other nonsense post, so that a person visiting that chat board would see an overwhelming majority of the posts and posters with a strong sell sentiment. They disparage the company’s products, employees, management, business plans, and anything else about the company so they can create serious doubt about the company in the minds of investors and potential investors. They post their opinions but make them appear to be facts. They make very slanted interpretations of anything the company does as if they were giving an expert analysis, with their conclusions always being the most negative they can be. When the company issues a positive press release, they state that the press release is all hype, released only to increase the stock price. If an insider makes a sale or exercises an option, they post false claims that management is dumping the stock because it is getting ready to drop. They ask questions about the company and its products such as: “What studies have they done to prove that their products are safe?” and “What’s to say that their products don’t cause cancer?” and “Don’t you think that the SEC should look into the way this company does business?” All comments made are negative or are cleverly and carefully worded posts intended to damage the company, by either giving people the idea that the company’s products are unsafe or cause cancer, that the company’s management is incompetent or dishonest, or to make people think that the company is doing something illegal and needs to be investigated by the SEC.


Honest investors, who happen upon the board, will often get buyers remorse from seeing an overwhelming negative sentiment and immediately “panic sell” the stock, which creates additional downward pressure and serves the criminal campaign well. Occasionally, an investor will attempt to say something positive about the company, but the resulting attacks on them will be vicious, thereby hurting their confidence in their investment decision and causing them to promptly abandon the board and usually the stock altogether. They simply do not realize that the bashers are on the board 24 by 7 because that is their job. That is how they earn their living.


There is No Limit to Their Efforts
There is no limit to what the bashers will do to try and drive down a stock price. They constantly make statements about how bad a victim company is managed or how incompetent it’s CEO is and call for shareholders to ask that the CEO be replaced. Another common practice is to make harassing phone calls to a company’s customers and suppliers and flood them with negative questions and comments about the company, its products and its management in order to damage the business relationships that it has with these companies. This practice has and will continue to destroy many new, existing, and developing business relationships. Bashers make posts about forming shareholder class action lawsuits against management and directors and intimate that the SEC should be investigating the company for fraud and lots of other securities violations. They encourage investors to contact the SEC about all of the supposed improprieties of what they refer to as the “pump and dump scheme” company.

Bashers will also send messages to the SEC, and other government agencies that might affect a companies’ business, with accusations of wrong doing by the company, and its officers and other employees. As a result, a company might get an inquiry from a well-meaning employee of the Better Business Bureau, FDA, NASD, the exchange the company trades on, or various others. Even though the company is able to answer such an inquiry, for a small company this is time consuming, costly, and diverts valuable limited resources away from the company’s actual business all to the gleeful delight and self serving interest of the criminals while assisting greatly in the success of the illegal manipulation.

Bashers post predictions of a much lower stock price in the near future to convince existing stockholders to sell so they don’t lose all of their investment. They make statements on a regular basis about the company being de-listed or going bankrupt, and they attack any shareholders that try to post anything positive about the company in an effort to defend it against the bashers. One website targeted companies by posting press releases about their victims, and misrepresenting them to look like they were produced by the SEC. That same website posted information that made it look like every company it reported on had their trading suspended or was being investigated by the SEC. The owner of the website is being prosecuted for securities fraud on another matter. As a result of those postings, each company’s stock price dropped dramatically. Why do the bashers do this? They do it to scare as many potential investors as possible away from purchasing the stock, and as many existing shareholders as they can into selling the stock in order to drive the stock price down. Again, as you can start to see, it all has a premeditated and cumulative negative effect.

Companies Are Slow To React
Companies that are attacked in this manner will often times ignore it at first, as just some disgruntled former employees. Depending on how aggressive and coordinated the bashers are, a targeted stock can drop quickly. The companies must then take notice and deal with the problem. They will get calls on a daily basis from shareholders that want to know about all the negative things that have been posted about them, and why the stock price is dropping. They want to know if the SEC is really investigating the company, or if there are class action suits pending against them or if their products are safe or not. The companies will then have to be in the business of following the various chat boards to see what is being said about them so that they can respond to their shareholders and potential investors that call them. This is not only an added expense in time and money for the company, but it also distracts them from the task of building their company and running the day-to-day operations of their business.

Companies that try to defend themselves through legal means will face still higher costs and an even greater waste of resources that make this activity difficult and expensive. Regardless, nearly every activity the bashers undertake is illegal, not policed, and designed to be totally self-serving and cumulative – and it almost always works. But when it doesn’t work enough to destroy most if not all the value, more bashers will be employed to expand the fraud by making the population of unhappy investors look even larger.

As the stock depreciates, the funding that most bootstrapping entrepreneurs need to grow their emerging businesses dries up, even though the extreme costs of being a public enterprise do not decrease. This leads to the loss of jobs, GNP, additional erosion of investor faith and the decline of economies of scale.

The Deck Is Stacked Against Small Business
The bashers claim to be protected by freedom of speech under the First Amendment. The problem with their argument is that what they are doing is illegal and fraudulent stock manipulation at the criminal level, defamation and tortuous interference with business relationships at the civil level. Chat board providers claim immunity from prosecution in anything relating to what is posted on their chat boards. In the late 1990’s, in an effort to allow free flow of content in the Internet, the Communications Decency Act, was enacted to protect Yahoo, AOL and other web portals from liability whenever posters put up content that was illegal, immoral or otherwise objectionable. So for example, if our children chatted with a masquerading Internet predator or saw pornography on an AOL website, then AOL would not have any responsibility.

The Act is now a shield of immunity for internet service providers and message and chat board companies that shy away from the moral responsibility due solely to the costs and resources they claim are needed to remove illegal, fraudulent, defamatory or otherwise destructive content. They have abuse departments who can only be contacted by email, and that only very selectively take any action against posters for violating their terms of service policy. Basically what it has turned into is an environment where anyone can post anything they want about a company no matter how far from the truth that is, and the company has very little, if any recourse against the anonymous person. Yet such a post can cause severe damage to the company and its future.

Anonymous and Untraceable
Bashers can work alone or with other bashers to attack a company, and post their attacks using multiple aliases to hold a conversation that appears to be among more than one poster, in order to give visitors to the chat boards the impression that there are many people sending these doomsday messages, and giving the attacks the appearance of credibility. The bashers use multiple aliases, anonymous email accounts, roving IP addresses and public access points, as well as other methods to avoid being traceable. Here are some of the comments that were made on one of the basher websites.

“Don't even bother trying to ID the account. It was created at the New York Public Library, Fifth Avenue location, and is only accessed through proxy servers.”

“Who are we? Your worst nightmare! “

”Imagine an anonymous team of professional researchers and writers with a network of mainstream contacts and all the investigative tools the Internet has to offer digging into your scam. Imagine a flash mob featuring you popping up overnight at twenty anonymous sites and sent to major news services via a news feed.”

”Here we are. And with anonymous proxy servers and public hard-wired and wireless Internet access points, there isn't a damn thing you can do about it. By the time you intimidate one of our free host sites to kill a report; it has been copied and mirrored ten times.”

There are also websites set up that offer to drive a company’s stock price down for a fee - NEW FROM FAKE - THE "DEATH STAR" FAKE's Bulgarian programmers have finally perfected the ultimate weapon of stock mass destruction. Basing their model on former Blinder and Robinson Broker Wendy Gordan of South Florida, FAKE has produced the last word in piss poor pump bots. With an unprecedented record of thirty total price collapses and massive reverse splits, put this MOAB of pump bots to work for you today! Wondrwen can drive a price to zero bid in three months or less, guaranteed by FAKE.

FAKE's business philosophy is simple: We are in it for the money. Period. We don't care who gets hurt, what companies get destroyed, or what innovative or lifesaving products never see the light of day!! We are here to get ours, and yours. FAKE the rest of them!! That is the attitude customers appreciate from a professional paid basher organization.

Why Have Financial Message Boards?
Message boards such as Yahoo, Raging Bull, and Silicon Investor give investors the opportunity to share their views and comments as they may relate to specific stocks or general investing. But they also allow disgruntled former employees, competitors, stock manipulators and others to post their negative messages. In many cases these negative posters have "shorted" a stock and want to do all that they can to see the stock price move downward. Negative posters usually don’t work alone. They team up with other “bashers” and gang attack a company.

The ISPs, and message and chat board companies have the best of both worlds. They are essentially immune from prosecution for any content that is posted on the websites or servers that they control, but they reap the benefits from all of the ad and other revenue that is generated by the banner and pop-up ads and services that appear or are offered on their websites and message and chat boards. This lack of accountability is a conflict of interest and needs to be remedied. The conflict of interest is very apparent when abuse complaints that are made by individuals and will they actually do anything to remove the abuse, even though they have this as an option as spelled out in their companies for posts that violate a provider’s Terms of Service Policy pass with no action to remedy the abuse. They send auto-reply emails which tell you to use their profanity filters, or to put the posters on an ignore list, but very rarely Terms of Service policies.

A Call For Help
Some will say that people don’t pay attention to chat boards, but they do. Ask some shareholders if they ever go to financial chat boards. You will be surprised by the number of people that do. The plan of the basher is to create havoc and cause sincere investors to lose confidence in the targeted companies. One poster we identified has made over 70,000 posts attacking various companies and hurting shareholder value. These bashers know that nothing will happen to them for doing this, and they feel that they are protected by the anonymity of the Internet, Freedom of Speech, SLAPP legislation and Internet jurisdictional issues, so they continue their relentless illegal attempts at manipulating stock prices of small businesses across America. Posting negative information about a company on public message boards isn’t illegal. However, intentional misinformation is actionable by governmental authorities, whenever it affects the trading price of a security. When contacted about this problem, the FBI said that they understand and are well aware of this problem. They explained that they have successfully prosecuted such cases but at too high of a cost and without recouping of significant monies afterward to warrant future action. Actually, their main focus currently is identity theft, which admittedly is a huge problem.

These bloggers and bashers for the financial gain of criminals and the support of economic terrorists are intentionally damaging shareholder value. This activity is illegal and needs to be stopped immediately to restore the smaller capital markets. This will in turn lead to the eventual and positive restoration of the overall capital markets and then finally the overall economy.

With this Position Paper we respectfully request that the SEC, in conjunction with all other state and federal law enforcement agencies, utilize the laws that already exist and are available to make the pursuit of these criminals a top and immediate priority. Companies with chat boards and phony web sites need to be forced to remove false content and turn over all records related to those individuals. We ask that the SEC expose, prosecute and convict these cyber criminals; it is the correct legal and moral activity to undertake at this time. Publish their real names on lists similar to what is now done with convicted child molesters so that service providers can guard against such criminals in the future. Making examples of the current batch of stock fraud cyber criminals, and then keeping the boards clean in the future, will have a profound positive effect on the capital markets and ultimately the economy. Although there are many phony web sites, there are truly only three influential chat boards where the problems are proliferated as described above. Yahoo alone receives, and profits immensely from over one hundred million investor hits per day, so putting pressure on them will cause its management to be influenced into becoming responsible for the crimes committed without hiding behind the CDA. Investor confidence needs to be restored, and this is one problem that has to be addressed and remedied in order for that to happen. Small public companies need the SEC’s help in this matter immediately to put these criminals out of business. Contrary to administrative sentiment, it would take very few resources to fix this problem. The criminals engaged in this activity are certainly cowards, as they do everything they can to retain their anonymity. For the reasons mentioned herein, it will require only a small amount of low budget intervention and prosecution by Federal authorities to insure that criminals are not so brazen and eager to attack small public companies in this manner in the future. Only then can the goal of efficient small company capital formation be achieved.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (92140)8/14/2005 11:33:06 AM
From: scion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Overstock.com Webcast Regarding August 11 Lawsuit, August 12, 2005

shareholder.com



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (92140)8/14/2005 11:52:30 AM
From: scion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Overstock's Short Fuse
By Seth Jayson (TMF Bent)
August 12, 2005

After reading yesterday's news release from Overstock.com (Nasdaq: OSTK), I couldn't help thinking it's time to short the beejezus out of it.

Yeah, I know, such an opinion is contrary to the thoughts of two of my colleagues. Fool co-founder David Gardner -- who could stuff me in the ol' career guillotine if he wanted -- picked the stock for his Motley Fool Rule Breakers newsletter, and Bill Mann, who has already forgotten more about investing than I know, selected the stock for Motley Fool Hidden Gems long before. But somehow, I don't think they'll be too surprised by my thoughts today.

After all, they made those calls before CEO Patrick Byrne went off the deep end. I mean that. These days, Byrne is looking nuttier than my Aunt Betty's chocolate bars.

Mulder's got nothing on Byrne
I sold my Overstock holdings a long time ago, when Byrne started complaining about shorts and admitted that he'd timed a Thanksgiving-season sales release in order to "knee shorts in the groin," or something to that effect. Since then, things have gotten much more strange.

We've already seen that he's on a mission to convince the world that he is a victim of a massive short conspiracy. For a while, the "naked" thing attracted the most attention. Unfortunately, I tend to believe the compelling arguments that suggest Byrne is, at the very least, being less than forthcoming about his relationship to the tinfoil-hat crowd -- including the now-famous Bob O'Brien (a cloak-and-dagger alias) -- who continue to promote this issue well beyond the bounds of logic.

Yesterday's news revealed that Overstock was actually filing a suit against several characters in the regular short game. (It's also a PR opportunity for the lawyers!) The accusation is that David Rocker and Gradient Analytics, among others, have conspired against Overstock. The suit alleges unfair competition under business and ethics code 17200 and 17500, as well as negligence under California common law.

Why is this filed in California? In the tech-happy Bay Area? My first guess was that Overstock figured it would be a lot easier to find a sympathetic hearing out there. But the real reason would appear to be that this is the stomping ground of one Mary Helburn, the lone shareholder who is put forward as the sympathetic average investor in this entire litigation scheme.

Further down the rabbit hole
Merely a random victim? Not a chance. Mary Helburn just happens to be the executive director of NCANS, the National Coalition Against Naked Shorting. This is the same organization that produced a video featuring Byrne (who claims that he's not involved in this on Overstock's behalf), as well as a person called Mary Campbell. In the video, she claims that recent portfolio losses of 50% are entirely the result of naked shorting. Some allege that Campbell is none other than Mary Helburn herself.

If you want more conspiracies, consider that Bob O'Brien, who also appears in the film, is allegedly identified (I haven't seen any proof of it) as one James Dale Davidson, founder of Agora Publishing, famous for its penny-stock promotions and other stock market absurdities.

Now, back to the surface for a breath of fresh air and a closer look at the lawsuit. It alleges that shorts like Rocker are helping Gradient put together its so-called "independent" -- and unflattering -- research reports, and that because of this, Overstock's shares have dropped from the $70s toward $30. Overstock and Helburn want their money back.

Pardon my insensitivity, but boo-friggity-hoo. I don't know anyone except for dear Ma and Pa Kettle who actually thinks stock opinions from the likes of these research tanks are unbiased. If there are specific violations of securities laws here -- like trading on knowledge of pending releases or false information -- why don't we see some activity on that front? It's telling that the complaint (as far as I can see) doesn't make a single quibble about the information Gradient provided, just the allegation that it was made with a short-seller's input.

So much for the philosophy major's logic
Even if it's true that Rocker and these analysts are in bed together, there's absolutely no logic in the argument that their alleged conspiracy is responsible for the cratering of Overstock's share price. Correlation does not prove -- or even imply -- causation. Dr. Byrne (the Ph.D. is in philosophy, from Stanford) ought to have studied enough logic to know that.

(If he's a bit rusty with his cum hoc ergo propter hoc, then perhaps he'd be interested in helping me market my new line of shark-repellent keychains. Since I started bringing these fantastic fobs into Fool HQ, they have been 100% successful in keeping sharks from entering our offices; there has not been a single shark attack. A bargain at $19.95, folks.)

In truth, I'm sure Byrne is completely aware of the logical fallacy in this complaint. But I'm sure he's also aware of the dearth of logic skills in the average courtroom and hopes that he can slide this one past. But that's a dangerous precedent to set.

If I short Overstock and he comes up with more of his trademark PR designed to make the company look good and raise the share price (the "knee in the groin" thing, well-timed personal share buybacks), is he prepared for my lawsuit alleging conspiracy and unfair competition? How long does he want to engage in this petty tit-for-tat? In the end, this cry for attention does a lot to undermine the esteem I had for him when he spoke here, and it certainly contradicts remarks he made about his belief in old-fashioned capitalism.

Put up or shut up
Here's a crazy idea: Maybe Overstock's share price has dropped for some other reason? Setting aside the possibility that aliens from the Shortokleptia Nebula have directed their money-sucking rays onto the ticker OSTK, I have a couple of other theories. Maybe it wasn't worth $70 a share to begin with. (And maybe it's not worth $40 today.) Maybe it's worth less precisely because of investor uncertainty over its lackluster results, along with an unsettling pattern of excuse-making from the head cheese himself.

Evidence of slowing sales growth and big losses has been conveniently brushed aside too often in the recent past. Everything seems to be blamed on "one-time charges" these days. I've got very little tolerance for that. I think our coverage of these issues ought to hold Byrne more accountable, as do these pointed comments from Jeff Matthews.

Step away from the tinfoil
It gives me no particular joy to say all of this; Byrne has always been great to us, and he even spoke at one of our meetings. I like overeducated weirdoes. But my bottom-line assessment is this: Byrne needs to ditch his unsavory crowd, take off the tinfoil hat, and do his job.

Byrne's job is to run the business toward profitability, not worry about the big baddies out there conspiring to take him down. As it is, he's got enough problems to cope with, including competition from Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN). Overstock is also making little headway in its doomed effort to capitalize on disgruntled eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY) users. Byrne needs to cope with the reality that Web shoppers are agnostic; they can hunt for better deals than Overstock's simply by using tools from Google (Nasdaq: GOOG), Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO), or Microsoft's (Nasdaq: MSFT) MSN.

If Byrne and Overstock can deliver top- and bottom-line results, this short problem will take care of itself. If there's profit to be made by going long on Overstock, investors will do it. Until then -- and as long as he's cozy with shady characters like Mary Helburn/Campbell and "Bob OBrien" -- Byrne should expect more shorting, legitimate and otherwise. And if he doesn't drop the nutty persecution complex, I'll probably place my bets on the short side as well.

For related Foolishness:

Stock down? Must be the market maker.
Even Bill Mann has started to wonder what's in the Kool-Aid at Overstock.
Or maybe not. Perhaps others aren't to blame.
It's not a Fool article, but it's a must-read for anyone interested in Overstock.
eBay is also a Stock Advisor pick. Click here to take a free 30-day trial.

Seth Jayson used to think retail was for suckers. At the time of publication, he had no position in any company mentioned here. And he promises not to read any more emailed ravings about the big naked short conspiracy. He's heard enough from the Lone Gunmen. View his stock holdings and Fool profile here. Fool rules are here.

fool.com



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (92140)8/14/2005 12:08:15 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
Same thing started happening with O’Brien. O’Brien worked with this woman, Mary Helburn, a lovely 69-year-old woman, who’s actually our co-plaintiff.

Overstock.com Webcast Regarding August 11 Lawsuit, August 12, 2005
shareholder.com

Making money the new-fashioned way

Sunday, December 05, 2004
madisonrecord.com

To the Editor:

I came across your publication and article while checking out another, what I consider to be, friviolous lawsuit against a company of which I hold shares.

Everyone has to make a living. I'm making mine by buying stocks of companies that get sued in class action lawsuits. It is all part of the scheme by short-sellers to drive the price down and make money. I go long.

I am able to retire because of a lawsuit. One of my stocks was sued by the usual suspects, but the complaint was so outrageous, I quadrupled my holdings and now have an income for life.

I've been investing for three years and this was just too good not to "let happen!" I got my first big dividend check yesterday on 20,000 shares. I bought them on margin and pay 4% interest and they are paying me 14% dividends.

The longs just love to share the news. We shareholders have our own website and you are welcome to join our discussion on the NFI Yahoo message board. It is a hoot.

You can see the website "as featured in the Wall Street Journal and Kansas City Business Journal." Boy, we would love to have a line including your Madison County Record!

Be sure to visit this site and get insight into what shareholders are doing to fight back without hiring lawyers.

nfi-info.net

Mary Helburn
Los Altos, Calif.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (92140)8/14/2005 1:18:17 PM
From: scion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
BYRNE FLAMES OUT
By RODDY BOYD

nypost.com

Patrick Byrne blew a gasket last week.

Byrne, the chief executive officer and founder of Web retailer Overstock.com, took to the airwaves and Internet on Friday and very memorably discussed the lawsuit his company filed against a local hedge fund and an independent research firm.

It was arguably the strangest performance by a corporate executive in recent memory. During the Webcast, he discussed a wide-ranging, interlocking series of relationships that, he asserted, actively conspired to depress the price of Overstock's equity.

Not content with arguing that the stock dropped to $46.87 from a high of $77.18 in January due to misplaced beliefs or fears, Byrne blasted a "Sith Lord" that, he claimed, coordinated the actions of several hedge funds and much of the American financial press.

He declined to identify the "Sith Lord," but described him as "a master criminal from the 1980s."

In the middle of the discussion, Byrne said that the SEC is informally investigating the company but declined to elaborate.

As if that wasn't strange enough, Byrne entitled his analysis of the so-called conspiracy, "The Miscreants Ball," a word play on the famous Drexel Burnham investor conference known as "The Predators Ball." He outlined a scenario whereby Rocker Partners, a hedge fund that generally shorts stocks it deems overpriced, fed misleading research from Gradient Analytics — an independent research firm based in Scottsdale, Ariz. — to a gullible and conflicted media.

In turn, the media, including organizations like The Street.com, CBS MarketWatch, Forbes Magazine and The Wall Street Journal, did the bidding of Rocker and wrote "hatchet jobs," he claimed.

David Rocker, general partner of Rocker Partners, was traveling and unavailable to comment.

Central to Byrne's analysis of media culpability was the alleged cooperation among traditionally bitter rivals. For example, he argued that in February, MarketWatch's columnist Herb Greenberg stopped writing about Overstock because "the assignment got passed" to Street.com Real Money columnist Jeff Matthews. Matthews, who runs a hedge fund, RAM Partners, would not comment other than to note that the linkage to Greenberg was "incredibly strange."

He added that he did not know any "Sith Lord."

Matthews, in addition to running a hedge fund, also runs a blog. In it, Matthews criticized Byrne for being excessively concerned about the role of short-sellers, and noted that "Byrne exhibits all the signs of a CEO with something to hide."

While noting that he worked with Rocker a decade ago, Matthews also criticized Byrne for spending so much time discussing short-sellers. He has no position in the company.

Aiding the multifaceted conspiracy, Byrne said, are the conflicts of regulators. The CEO singled out Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, because he went to law school with Jim Cramer, an owner of Street.com, and had been an investor in a fund run by Cramer. A spokesman did not return a call inquiring whether Spitzer knew of any "Sith Lord" in this context.

Those were among the more lucid components of his presentation.

In one memorable sequence, he connected The Wall Street Journal columnist Jesse Eisinger to the harassment of a 70-year-old woman in Las Vegas. Later, he alluded to a baton being passed to Carol Redmond of Dow Jones Newswires, and began a discussion of how her French background affects her ability to cover Overstock.com accurately.

Redmond, Byrne said, took the phrase "he took a bath" to mean he frequented "gay bathhouses." In an attempt to clear up any misconceptions, he said he did not.

Later, Byrne argued that "as a libertarian, I don't care if anyone thinks I'm gay." Appropos of nothing, he also said he wasn't "a coke head."

The Journal's Eisinger declined comment, as did MarketWatch's Greenberg. Redmond was unavailable to comment.

A spokesman for Overstock said that Byrne was committed to standing up for the company and "righting wrongs where he sees them." The presentations, the spokesman said, was not part of the long-range public relations strategy of the company. He said that Byrne, to his knowledge, is not currently under any psychiatric care and that he was sober when he gave the presentation.

Byrne's lawyer, Wes Christian, said that he understood how many reporters and investors could be confused or dismayed by the presentation. He said his later appearance on CNBC made his case better.




To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (92140)8/14/2005 6:10:37 PM
From: bobofncans  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
It's funny. I predicted that Herb and Carol would print attacks within a few hours, and right on schedule, they did.

Carol's even featured a false and misleading original headline that was changed after trading was over.

Gotta hand it to these clowns. They telegraph their punches bigtime.

Smells like desperation from the hedge fund camp.

That means a huge opportunity to play the squeeze from the long side, if that is your thing. Dunno. I'm just happy to see that the whole thing is now going to see the antiseptic light of sunshine.

Go see the entire saga at NCANS.net - it's all documented in excruciating detail.