Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Kerry Defender -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (158)	8/14/2005 10:04:38 AM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 334

Reprint........American Spirit, I made this post to someone else a few months ago. Before the first simple amoeba appeared (according to evolutionists) that we supposedly evolved from their had to have been a big bang (according to the theory). I personally as a Christian have no problem with the big bang because science in the areas of math and physics is discovering how God did things and ordered the universe. Consider the scientists estimated age of the universe. What they base their estimate on is based on a mistaken concept. If you can imagine the pre big bang universe...a point in "time" where time does not yet exist. Time was created with the universe along with all the rest of physics. Imagine the first trillionth of a second of the big bang when all the matter and energy of the universe was concentrated into one pinpoint, when all that matter sprang from nothing. In such a unimaginable universe gravity from the entire mass of the universe concentrated in one point would be so great that time could not move forward. Relativity. The scientific guestimate of the age of the universe is based on the rate of expansion as we see it today. It assumes all the laws of the universe were constant, that time was constant. But the calculations they base these estimates on are fatally flawed. Physics should show them that those calculations have to be wrong. Because at the beginning of the big bang time could not possibly behave trapped as it was in an infinite gravity as it does today after the universe has expanded. In the beginning time could not move forward. In the beginning the rate of expansion had to be faster than today by almost infinity. Any explosion has a tremendous rate of expansion at the beginning and then it slows near the end of it's expansion. In the beginning then time would be frozen and the expansion would be near infinity. Only near the end of the expansion would time speed up and the expansion slow. That is relativity. So today's estimates of the age of the universe are based totally on error. It is beyond the ability of man today to make the correct calculations. Answer me this. Where did all the energy and mass of the universe come from btw? From nothing? It takes as much faith to believe that as it does to believe there is a God. The real fact is that you just made a choice what you want to believe based on nothing except a flawed understanding. A greater force had to create the order we see. That's an absolute. Mathematics proves that the universe could not have evolved. Steven Hawking in his book A Brief History of Time stated that the universe always goes from order to disorder. That is THE ONLY observable tendency in the universe. Nothing ever has been seen going from disorder to order. Therefore the order in the universe had to have been put there by a greater power than the universe. That's Hawking's conclusion and he took a lot of heat from the unbelieving scientific community for writing that. Evolution goes against all observation of the true nature of the universe!! No one btw has ever seen a new species evolve from something else. Things mutate and adapt and become extinct but have never evolved. Scientists who want to prove their own opinion have introduced bad science to try and prove evolution. And part of that flawed science is estimating the age of the universe to be billions of years. The reason for that is it's the only way for them to explain why we cannot observe any evolution. They say it takes too long for us to see. But the age of the universe is not what they say it is. And in this universe there is only one observable fact. Order only breaks down. it is never seen going to other way, order coming out of disorder on it's own. Only an outside force can create order out of disorder in this universe.