SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (7623)8/14/2005 10:41:16 PM
From: Edward W. Richmond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8117
 
Pictouislander, Naturalperson and Lemuel,

How many times can investors get burned before they eventually realize that the stove is hot and they begin to exercise great caution? You are seeing great caution.

However, your suggestions about looking forward have some merit. So here is your challenge. If Pyng is getting its act together and it is to continue, the selection of the next CEO is critical to continued that success.

Challenge - Will Pyng (really Mike, IMO) choose a totally independent CEO??????? That is, one that is NOT an extension of Mike. If the new CEO is a past director or member of management, other that possibly Judy Findlay, I would see big problems. I recall one past director (a FOM) who exercised options and sold them into strength to the point that his holdings were consistently modest. The future success, in my opinion, is more related to the selection of the new CEO than any other single factor.

Don't give me excuses like, "He knows the business." or "He has proven himself with the company." ............ No matter how the selection of a FOM is rationalized, in my view, it would spell potential disaster.

Let's see who is selected. I have my bets in place. Anybody else willing to suggest that the new CEO won't be an 'inside' job? Well, Pictouislander, Naturalperson and Lemuel, your thoughts please.

Just my opinion. I would love to hear from others and then have us all accountable when the decision is made.

I don't think that critical comments on this board have any significant lasting effect on the stock. Fundamentals ultimately rule.

Best regards,
Ed



To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (7623)8/14/2005 10:57:57 PM
From: esxtarus  Respond to of 8117
 
They call people who make unpopular statements Bashers But I will call them FACTS until proven otherwise. There are some people that just showed up on this board that do not know the history of PYNG and a person that does can not speak his mind. Well they are mistaken because history has a way of repeating its self. WHERE ARE THE EXEC NOTES TO KEEP THE SHAREHOLDERS INFORMED THAT WHERE PROMISED?????