SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40411)8/16/2005 4:31:11 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
Shakespeare already highlighted a Liar in the form of Iago.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40411)8/16/2005 4:42:25 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
They are not anti-war. Like Viet Nam "anti-war" protesters they want the enemy to win. They have no objection to war AGAINST the U.S. -- it's the U.S. fighting back that they are against.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40411)8/16/2005 4:45:33 AM
From: paret  Respond to of 93284
 
Real estate agents are helping illegal immigrants realize their dreams of ownership
Houston Chronicle ^ | August 16, 2005 | ANNA GORMAN

EACH week, Pedro Morlet knocks on doors in the East San Francisco Bay, looking for illegal immigrants.

Morlet isn't an immigration agent. He's a real estate agent, and he's scouting for business.

"Do you want a house, work and pay taxes but don't have a Social Security number?" reads his flier, written in Spanish and tailored to his potential customers. "We can help you LEGALLY!"

Across the country, particularly in Texas and parts of the Midwest, hundreds of illegal immigrants have bought homes using special lending programs that bypass the need for a Social Security number. Now, with backing from some of the country's largest financial institutions, this newest effort to tap customers for the real estate market is moving to the nation's largest concentration of illegal immigrants — California.

As buyers begin to queue up, real estate is becoming the latest arena to highlight the often-bizarre contradictions of American immigration policy.

Legally speaking

Advocates of tighter controls on immigration oppose the idea. Lending money to illegal immigrants encourages others to cross the border, they say.

"They have no right to own property in the United States because they have no right to be here in the first place," said Diana Hull, president of Californians for Population Stabilization. Legally, that's not quite true. Unlike some countries — Mexico, for example — the United States generally does not restrict foreign citizens from buying real estate.

But for years, because buying a home required a Social Security number, the only way for an illegal immigrant to do so was by using a false number. In addition, such immigrants often were rejected or overlooked by legitimate lenders, leaving them vulnerable to fraud.

Customers await

Lenders have a powerful incentive to find ways to get around those barriers: tens of thousands of potential customers. The National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals estimates that more than 216,000 undocumented immigrants, including many who have been in the country for decades, could buy homes if they had access to the market.

Despite their undocumented status, many prospective buyers earn steady incomes, face little risk of deportation and are desperate to become homeowners. Their mortgages would amount to millions of dollars.

"You have gainfully employed people who have been stuffing money in the mattress for a long time," said Mary Mancera, spokeswoman for the association. "There are quite a few who have been working and saving money and raising kids and going about their lives and want to achieve that next step, but haven't been able to because of the barriers."

'An investment'

Silvia Avalos, a hairstylist, and her husband, José Luis Avalos, a busboy, are among the people Mancera is talking about. They were tired of spending their money on rent each month but didn't want to use fake Social Security numbers to buy a home.

After friends told them they could buy legally, they found a two-bedroom condominium northeast of San Francisco, for $280,000. They moved in as soon as escrow closed.

"We saw it as an investment," Silvia Avalos said. "While you are here, you have somewhere to live that is yours. And if you return home, you can sell it."

Tax numbers

The opportunity to get people like the Avalos family into the market begins with the IRS, which is happy to collect peoples' taxes, regardless of their immigration status.

Nearly a decade ago, the IRS began giving out Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers so people without Social Security numbers could pay taxes. Since then, more than 8 million applicants have received numbers, and about 2 million are used on tax returns.

The IRS knows illegal immigrants are using the numbers to get mortgages.

"We don't have control over whatever the taxpayers do with the numbers other than filing a tax return," spokeswoman Irma Trevino said.

In addition to the ID numbers, immigrants must show that they have been in the country, worked and paid taxes for at least two years in order to get mortgages. Because many do not have credit scores, they must prove their good credit through documents such as utility and cell phone bills, rent receipts, bank statements and paychecks. The interest rates and loan costs are in line with those of buyers who have Social Security numbers.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40411)8/16/2005 4:53:45 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
The Sheehan Spectacle (We're witnessing a replay of the media's cynical catering to the 9-11 widows)
The American Prowler ^ | 8/16/2005 | George Neumayr

A good illustration of the collusion between axe-grinding victims and the cynical media that exploit them appeared after one of last year's presidential debates: a placard was crassly put up in "spin alley" to direct reporters to "9-11 widows" who were eager to provide them with quotes disparaging George Bush for not making the right noises during the debate.

Cindy Sheehan and the media's manipulative use of her brings this episode back to mind. We're witnessing a replay of the media's cynical catering to the 9-11 widows, dubbed the "Jersey Girls," which began with great interest but then trailed off in proportion to the media's embarrassment about their wildly imprecise and boring charges. The media, thrilled to have something to work with during the dog days of August, will soon lose interest in Sheehan too.

Owing in large part to the microscopic powers of the Internet and talk radio, the mainstream media now realize that they can only get away with using axe-grinding victims to advance their agenda for so long. As news of the victims' dangerously ill-conceived views becomes well-known through the alternative media, mainstream reporters, if only out of self-consciousness, stop using these victims as proxies for their biases.

The media know that grief doesn't confer upon a person instant lucidity and authority, though they act as if it does, provided the grief inspires a political position they favor. Had Sarah Brady, say, responded to her husband's death by joining the staff of the NRA, the media wouldn't have paid the slightest bit of attention to her except maybe for purposes of mockery. Obviously the media aren't interested in assuaging Sheehan's grief -- were a bigger story to break they would desert her in a second, as they even did to their persecuted colleague Judith Miller after Bush announced John Roberts as his Supreme Court nominee.

What the media are interested in is Sheehan's politics, and the window of that interest will close for good once the public learns of her ambitiously radical views -- that Bush should be impeached as a war criminal, that America is an abomination not worth defending against terrorists, and so forth. In the end, the media will probably have added to her grief once they take away from her the new life of celebrity activism they have encouraged her to pursue in the absence of the life of her son.

Sheehan doesn't speak for war widows and grieving moms any more than the Jersey Girls spoke for all relatives of 9-11 victims. And like them, Sheehan hasn't crafted her case very carefully or modestly. Just as the Jersey Girls acted as though their grief somehow made them experts on rearranging the CIA and entitled them to harangue Condi Rice, so Sheehan is making outrageous demands upon the military's commander in chief -- demands only possible in a democracy in which a fatuous media can get its leaders, who are supposed to be thinking about the common good, entangled in all sorts of absurd and superficial controversies.

What the Wall Street Journal's Dorothy Rabinowitz said about the 9/11 windows is worth recalling in light of the Sheehan spectacle. One of them, Kristen Breitwester, had submitted an op-ed to the Wall Street Journal. Rabinowitz advised against running it, saying that it was "total and complete nonsense -- not to mention repetitive nonsense -- nonsense from people given endless media access to repeat the very same stupid charges, suspicions, and the rest....this is just an opportunity for these absurd products of the zeitgeist -- women clearly in the grip of the delusion that they know something, have some policy, and wisdom not given to the rest of us to know -- to grab the spotlight."

Ultimately, the media tuned them out, especially, as liberals complained, after they endorsed John Kerry and their overt liberal partisanship made it impossible for the media to treat them as sainted experts.

Sheehan is one of these absurd products of the zeitgeist that Rabinowitz describes -- a zeitgeist that gravitates to grief for commercial and ideological, not human, reasons. Sheehan, too, may find herself, as Breitwester did, standing forlornly beneath a placard announcing her grief and loss, hoping that some reporter will stop and give her the jolt of celebrity that substitutes in a twisted culture for the comfort of real compassion.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40411)8/16/2005 4:56:18 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
Code Pinko-- the Cindy Sheehan affair



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40411)8/16/2005 1:43:16 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 93284
 
GRIEVING ANTI-WAR MOM SHOWS UNAPPEALING BIAS AGAINST ISRAEL
-- The Politicization of Grief?

"You get America out of Iraq and Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism." -- Cindy Sheehan, anti-war protestor in Crawford.

iconoclast.ca

The front page of just about every newspaper this weekend noted the anti-war protest of Cindy Sheehan, a very sympathetic figure and mother of a soldier who was killed in Iraq. Not surprisingly, various anti-Bush elements in the U.S. and Canada have jumped on board Ms. Sheehan's protest - casting her and her message as an example of courageous heroism.

In particular, she has been praised and heralded by Democrats such as Joe Trippi (campaign manager for Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean's campaign for President), by Michael Moore, and by organizations such as Democrats.com, MoveOn.org, True Majority, and Democracy for America.

However, take another look at Cindy Sheehan's quote at the top of this commentary. If only it were an aberration. Unfortunately, it represents only a tip of the iceberg of Ms. Sheehan's world-view.

In a letter to Nightline, Ms. Sheehan wrote that the entire Iraq War was part of a neo-conservative plot to benefit Israel:

"Am I emotional? Yes, my first born was murdered. Am I angry? Yes, he was killed for lies and for a PNAC Neo-Con agenda to benefit Israel. My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel."

Is Israel such a scourge on the world that it's implied infamy outranks the scurrilous deeds of the overthrown Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, who did in fact:

* operate rape rooms and torture chambers (not only for authoritarian political purposes, but for his own sadistic entertainment pleasure). * launch chemical weapons against his own people (murdering thousands of innocent & helpless non-combatant women and children).

* housed terrorists as his guests in Iraq - terrorists such as Abu Nidal, who murdered Leon Klinghoffer on the Achille Lauro cruise ship.

* paid a bounty of $25,000 to the families of Palestinian homicide bombers.

* established stronger links to the al Qaeda terrorist network than the mainstream media are willing to acknowledge (for a new comprehensive summary of the latest evidence, check out www.HusseinAndTerror.com).

Viewed as part of a painful grieving process, Cindy Sheehan's distorted politicization of her son's death can be excused though not validated.

But can the same be said for the various elements of the media, Democratic Party and anti-war movement who are encouraging and abetting Ms. Sheehan's demonization of the state of Israel in an attempt to discredit George W. Bush?

.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40411)8/16/2005 10:37:04 PM
From: paret  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93284
 
SALES LAG FOR Woodward BOOK ON DEEP THROAT
Tue Aug 16 2005 19:01:49 ET

Sales of THE SECRET MAN, Bob Woodward's story of the source known as Deep Throat, have been underwhelming.

At Prairie Lights Books in Iowa City, "the book didn't sell at all," said Jim Harris, the store's owner. Of the 50 copies he ordered, Harris said, only four have sold, and he has sent 40 back to the distributor. "I was flabbergasted," he tells Wednesday editions of the NY TIMES.

At Politics and Prose, a well-known independent bookstore in Washington, sales were "not very good, compared to expectations," said Mark LaFramboise, who ordered 400 copies of the book for the store. As of last week, Politics and Prose had sold "60-something," he said.

The book has sold 61,000 copies, according to BookScan, trailing Ed Klein's TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY [which is nearing 100,000 copies purchased].

Developing...



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40411)8/18/2005 2:38:10 AM
From: AuBug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93284
 
Sheehan is far more sane than you or bush.