Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (35420)	8/16/2005 11:16:10 AM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116555

KT this was limit. Not pot limit - $2 limit It is rare to pull a bluff at limit especially with a Creek Brother in the game. In this case I got away with a bluff at limit only Because a Creek brother was in the game (betting as I figured on the third worst hand). Another $2 raise at that point was not going to cost me but $2. Had Creek had a full boat with queens he would have raised and that would have been that. Besides, I wanted to get in Georges mind more with my pre-announcement. It was well worth $2. Actually I think my play was one of the best plays you will ever see because it involved a successful bluff at a limit game with a weak player in the hand. Bluffs in limit games with weak players are very difficult. Had the third player not been a strong player it would not have worked. Mish