Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorne who wrote (65462)	8/16/2005 1:09:33 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Is there anything wrong in speaking out against the President? Remember Nixon and Watergate. Those folks who spoke out then were the true patriots since they were the first to speak out against a band of crooks who came to occupy the WH. Is there anything wrong in speaking out against the atrocities in Iraq where innocent civilians are getting killed and where the Iraqis are being forced into hardships because of the presence of the US soldiers? The terrorists are there because the US soldiers went in there. Isn't it why Rumsfeld has termed them as "foreign terrorists." I prefer that it be the terrorists' bullets which kill innocent Iraqi civilians "instead of US military bullets killing them.", since the terrorists may believe in collateral damage like Saddam did. But surely the US should not agree with the terrorists and Saddam in the "collateral damage" theory. There is no excuse for a civilized society like the US is to standby and let their President and his men run amok and kill innocent civilians and cause them hardships in Iraq. Iraq: An upside-down place news.bbc.co.uk New claims of Iraq prisoner abuse news.bbc.co.uk Iraq war trauma: Your experiences news.bbc.co.uk Reconstruction news.bbc.co.uk So stop your damn nonsense since it does not help the situation.

To: lorne who wrote (65462)	8/16/2005 11:33:04 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Bush should not be considered a legit president. He smeared McCain to get the nomination in 2000, cheated to win in Florida in 2000 to beat Gore (well proven now), started the Iraq War to steal the 2002 midterms (smearing war hero Max Cleland and others) and cheated in 2004 with both the smearvets campaign and the Ohio (and other states) voter fraud. Exit polls in 2000 and 2004 both showed Bush losing. They have never been wrong until Karl Rove came into the picture. Both races were rigged in key states. Bush-Cheney need to be impeached. Not only were they dishonestedly elected but they have failed miserably and trashed common ethics standrds. Helping them has been Tom Delay, the most corrupt congressional leader in our history. A proven crook.