SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: trouthead who wrote (696883)8/16/2005 3:04:02 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
and I suppose you are one of the morons that thinks Iraq never had any WMD or that yo buddy Saddam, never funded terrorists all over the world, or never thumbed his nose at 17 broken UN agreements, or etc etc etc...



To: trouthead who wrote (696883)8/16/2005 4:37:41 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
I suppose you're one of those people that think Saddam was behind 9/11?

Why do you suppose that?
The only ones I hear talking about that possibility are the deranged lefties who keep accusing level heads of thinking it.



To: trouthead who wrote (696883)8/16/2005 4:50:36 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Wrong. You people can never give credit when it's due:

"When Qaddafi watched a U.S. medic probe Saddam's hair for lice and poke around his mouth, he was stunned," several sources tell Insight. Western diplomats in Tripoli agree that Saddam's capture "traumatized" the Libyan leader. "What happened is very clear," an administration official says. "Things happened, and immediately afterward the Libyans did things in response."

Until Saddam's capture, "we were still negotiating. Both sides were sparring back and forth," a British official involved in the talks says. "Things radically changed course after that." Just 10 days later, Qaddafi made his official announcement that Libya was giving up its WMD programs...

insightmag.com