SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (246350)8/17/2005 2:19:54 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572131
 
RE:"Were the three homos like three different bears.....grizzlies, polar and black bears or was their relationship more distant?"

Similar but perhaps more closely related. One definition of a species is the ability to breed and create viable-reproductable offspring. If Neandertal genes exist today it would suggest at least Cro-Magnon and Neandertal were close enough to be capable of that.



To: tejek who wrote (246350)8/17/2005 12:41:58 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572131
 
tejek,

re:Were the three homos like three different bears.....grizzlies, polar and black bears or was their relationship more distant?

There was a show on the History channel last week "Ape to man" which covered the various Homo branches and claimed if you went back about 3 million years you could find a common ancestor.

It also spent a lot of time discussing fraud in the search for the missing link via the Piltdown man.

talkorigins.org

If you can find the show - it's pretty interesting.