SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SiouxPal who wrote (39034)8/17/2005 6:16:21 PM
From: one_less  Respond to of 90947
 
I don't know what Republicans should do. I don't buy into your line drawing partisanship. I doubt that most reasonable Republicans and Democrats do either.

However, those spokespersons who have advocated for the operations in Iraq, should respond to the request to explain the term 'Noble Cause' in the context of our current situation. It should begin with Bush or people who speak for his administration and continue to every spokesperson who considers this effort worth while.

Since they are not doing that, the impression is that Cindy has them by the marbles.

I told you long ago, in my first post on your own thread that 'inquiry', not 12million unsubstantial bashing posts, is the seed to creating the conflicts that lead to change and renewal.

Message 21585376

I argued the point against the brick walls who hold up on your thread, until you were so disgraced that you banned me.

Message 21587571

I attempted to articulate the benefits of inquiry and sound reason, based on principle for generating liberal innovation. Of course you were insulted by that ... go figure, and go back to your conspiracies and bashing if you like.

Anyway the power of Cindy has been in making the inquiry, 'What Noble Cause?'.

If the spokespersons cannot or will not respond by explaining the term 'Noble Cause' in the context of Iraq, then they should admit it and openly declare what they believe to be the justifications for being in Iraq are.

I am amazed at the lack of boldly stated and straight forward response.



To: SiouxPal who wrote (39034)8/17/2005 7:01:12 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
BTW, I can criticise Bush and others for refusing to deal with Cindy because I don't respond to sound reasoning and inquiry with bannings and putting people on ignore. You're criticisms, however, lack genuine appeal.