Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Err America: They Report, They Decide -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rock_nj who wrote (329)	8/18/2005 7:42:32 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1513

"Can say with a straight face that you are not biased in your opinions?" Nope! Unlike you I openly admit I'm biased. And unlike you I feel no need to pretend I'm not biased while continuing to expose a clear liberal bias for all to see - I.E., making precisely the same arguments justifying the lack media coverage of the Air Ameriscam scandal while simultaneously applying the exact same standards justifying wide media coverage of Rush Limbaugh. In case you missed it, neither party has yet been convicted of breaking any law although a court has found that Air Ameriscam was"engaging in a "sham transaction" and "fraudulent conveyance" of assets in order to avoid paying its debts". Also, unlike you I candidly factor my bias into discerning & filtering credible evidence from false, blatantly distorted, intentionally misleading agenda driven assertions &/or unsubstantiated OPINION disguised as fact. And unlike you I generally do not insert my biased opinions into discussions without having at least some detailed knowledge of the issue being discussed nor without the ability to substantiate my POV with credible evidence. Additionally, unlike you, when faced with credible evidence that clearly undermines my POV, I do not continue to push my now discredited POV unabated &/or change the parameters of the debate to deflect them away from the flawed POV I had been asserting was credible (both of which is precisely what you have done in your reply to me BTW). Instead, I willingly admit this information undermines my POV, then I change my POV to reflect the reality of this additional credible evidence. Like I said, come back when you are ready to discuss the issues based on reality, unclouded by your obvious liberal bias.