Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DB0666 who wrote (7724)	8/21/2005 6:28:58 PM
From: mf160	Respond to of 8117

Hello DB0666 Remember Nortel's creative accounting that got its share price to 120.00. Who paid there - THE SHAREHOLDERS As for rating this company I never did but when mikey is gone and a REAL CEO is chosen I will give it a 12 and buy more shares. I remember a company Tatusus resources went to 12 bucks because they claimed to be able to extract enough hydrogen out of water than energy in (perpetual motion) you would not believe how stubborn those believers were. When the VSE stepped in the company came back and said OH we forgot to tell you we meant using wind or solar. The company is now GONZO. The whole time I remember thinking 'I wish I shorted stocks'. I am sure there are those that still blame the Negatives for the demise. Holding the CEO over a fire is a good thing especially if trading on the venture. The Fast1 isn't a scam but the minority shareholders have been scammed one to many times.

To: DB0666 who wrote (7724)	8/21/2005 9:37:50 PM
From: Jack Rayfield	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8117

Pyng has never broken down its sales by Military and Civilian. So there is absolutely nothing in the public domain to compare LOR's report against. But the lion share of the PRs lately have involved the increasing demand in the Military so I think the sales to them over the last 3 months is pertinent. I rate Pyng a 10 because it should double from here just based on the information that is known ( .015 X 4X 30=C$1.80). Why is it so hard for you to see that that type of appreciation should rate a 10. I believe the financial statements are audited on an annual basis so I do not doubt the sales figures for a minute. My only problem is with Mike and I think if you look at his posts at one time he did respond to questions on this forum but he also promised better communication which would make that unnecessary. Why do you think that a breakdown of sales has not been published as part of an Executive Notes or the annual report? I think it important information. By the way are you related to naturalperson because your tone is very similar? Jack

To: DB0666 who wrote (7724)	8/22/2005 12:18:53 AM
From: Edward W. Richmond	Respond to of 8117

DB0666, I just checked your profile data. You are a member since 4:20 P.M. August 21, 2005. Is this info correct? Did you register for the first time today, register under a second name or ...? I am interested for a number of reasons including credibility. Regards, Ed

To: DB0666 who wrote (7724)	8/22/2005 8:52:42 AM
From: LOR	Respond to of 8117

DB0666 SEE MY PREVIOUS + POSTS wherein I stated I was considering buying more PYNG shares. What we oldtimers have figured out is: 1) PYNG has a heck of a good product AND we believe that EVENTUALLY sales of the FAST1 will generate significant profits and share value............. HOWEVER, we also believe that: 2) PYNG management has been less than forthcoming with a true picture of PYNG's progress FOR YEARS. My hope in posting the summary of the www.usainfo.com report showing falling U.S. military sales was to have either other posters or PYNG management itself produce SOLID information either confirming the information in that report or showing why the sales data is incomplete. WHAT have we seen so far??.....NOTHING from PYNG and nothing but useless babel from folks like naturalperson. My CONCLUSION: This stock is a solid BUY for LONG TERM investors and even now I suspect the stock may well hit CDN$1.00 later this year (as I previously posted). Who knows, a "sale" only becomes a sale when the product is invoiced. Perhaps PYNG has a stack of undelivered military ORDERS. Let's all hope that they do! Let's just say that I would be inclined to but "fewer" new shares than I would have BEFORE I got my hands on the report! We should all have a chance to see independent reports out there and for those like naturalperson who get so upset I can only suggest that they take in a deep breath or two and perhaps reach for their valium! LOR