Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (46592)	8/22/2005 8:27:41 AM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213172

Did you mean that the users's net cost is 20 bucks more than it would have been on the iTMS? Exactly. It is true that the user would have had access to a bunch of other songs during the period, so perhaps that's worth the extra 20 bucks. I think it is fair to say that the vast majority of people would pay the $20 for two years of access to all of that music. It is worth that much just to be able to preview the entire song instead of just 30 seconds before you buy. Of course, if you dont buy 25 CD's a year, the numbers change. A person who buys more would actually save money versus iTMS while a person who only buys a CD or two a year would be spending considerably more. Slacker