To: partysasquatch- who wrote (589 ) 8/22/2005 11:19:58 AM From: rrufff Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6687 You've got to be kidding. I'm not going to claim to be an expert on INSQ or even "pump" it. However, it appears that the entire group of companies has gone through major restructuring, all of which on paper, looks shareholder friendly, with the ultimate payout to the insiders being more closely geared towards shareholder returns. This is unusual for penny stocks but, yes, I always assume any penny or sub-penny COULD be a total scam. Now as to who on RB is "pumping." I don't follow RB at this point as most of the posts (if you can even get on the board) are pumpers, bashers and spam. So I wouldn't buy or sell based on that. Would you buy or sell because a bunch of bashers show up on RB? Finally, you call it "crapola". I'd call any of our penny and sub-penny stocks "crappola" with 2 P's for pink and penny. Seriously, I could take any of your picks and totally bash them with just a tiny bit of research. We are talking "Mafia" plays, pump plays, developmental companies. We love them and we've all made a lot of money playing them. But they are not big board companies. They're not Enron, WCOM or Global Crossing. (Thank goodness, right?) Look at RSHN. If I wanted to start posting about the massive volume and the shares not moving it and what that means in terms of likely dilution and dumping, I could. Yet, you seem to like RSHN. Don't get me wrong, I'm NOT bashing RSHN, but I could, giving reasons at least as compelling as your post re INSQ. You want to try GCHR? I'm not opposed to bashing or pumping per se, but it's a bit hypocritical to come on and paint with broad strokes as "crapola" when you appear to promote and post in favor of stocks that are higher on the crapPola list. Nothing personal intended. Happy investing..