Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (38804)	8/22/2005 2:25:14 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 306849

Well, Bush is a lame duck President and the treasury isn't getting any tax money from it anyway. I see that the NAR rep is directing traffic around the issue and trying to help the "poor". LOL In 1996 when Forbes was touting a flatter tax the NAR ran radio ads against him. Complaining about the loss of any mortgage interest deduction. Just think what they will do now.

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (38804)	8/22/2005 2:30:43 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 306849

RE:"Members have said at hearings that they are considering a wide range of ways to stimulate savings." When you think about what the Congress has done to Savers it's almost criminal. They have essentially given risk takers, many with "nothing to lose" (no savings), the ability to leap frog right over them.