Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask and You Shall Receive -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rainy_Day_Woman who wrote (6606)	8/24/2005 12:38:46 AM
From: Neenny	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14396

RDW, I privately pointed out to Gregor, that the number of ignores people have on SI is no way an indication of a person's character. I pointed out the following information on the regular posters of this board and the # of ignores they have. I am sorry Gregor, you were out of line making such a comment, you made a blanket statement equating the number of ignores to "deep spiritual issues" So let's look at this fact as it reflects the other posters on our thread. Let's start with you and me. Gregor..........ignored by 3 with 15 total people marks Neenny..........ignored by 5 with 50 total people marks Akafoobar.......ignored by 15 with 110 total people marks Shoot1st........ignored by 24 with 106 total people marks Lone-gone.......ignored by 29 with 27 total people marks Westi...........ignored by 30 with 21 total people marks I really hoped that pointing out this information would have prompted an apology to Shootie, as I feel that one was in order. I can confirm your statements about Shootie and knowing him both online and offline. He is a man of integrity and character. You are absolutely right in when you say he is a caring, helpful and giving man. I must agree with you also when you say he is a little sinner, but then again which one of us is not guilty of some sin?? If memory serves me, the last perfect man was crucified, for us sinners!! Thanks for your boldness in wanting to correct the incorrect impression some might have of him. I probably should have been publicly more bold in my defense of him. Jane For the record........ I posted part of private message that I wrote. I did not post it as breech in confidentiality, since I am the author of the original private message. I also mean no offense to anyone who's number of ignores I just posted. It was strictly an effort to show that the number of ignores a person has, does not in anyway reflect their character.