SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JBTFD who wrote (697953)8/24/2005 2:56:07 PM
From: JBTFD  Respond to of 769670
 
Message 21633539

Verbatim quotes from when Clinton was committing
troops to Bosnia:

"You can support the troops but not the president."
---Rep Tom Delay (R-TX)

"Well, I just think it's a bad idea. What's going to
happen is they're going to be over there for 10, 15,
maybe 20 years."
---Joe Scarborough (R-FL)

"Explain to the mothers and fathers of American
servicemen that may come home in body bags why their
son or daughter have to give up their life?"
---Sean Hannity, Fox News, 4/6/99

"[The] President . . . is once again releasing
American military might on a foreign country with an
ill-defined objective and no exit strategy. He has
yet to tell the Congress how much this operation will
cost. And he has not informed our nation's armed
forces about how long they will be away from home.
These strikes do not make for a sound foreign policy."
---Sen Rick Santorum (R-PA)

"American foreign policy is now one huge big mystery.
Simply put, the administration is trying to lead the
world with a feel-good foreign policy."
---Rep Tom Delay (R-TX)

"If we are going to commit American troops, we must be
certain they have a clear mission, an achievable goal
and an exit strategy."
---Karen Hughes, speaking on behalf of George W Bush

"I had doubts about the bombing campaign from the
beginning . . . I didn't think we had done enough in
the diplomatic area."
---Senator Trent Lott (R-MS)

"I cannot support a failed foreign policy. History
teaches us that it is often easier to make war than
peace. This administration is just learning that
lesson right now. The President began this mission
with very vague objectives and lots of unanswered
questions. A month later, these questions are still
unanswered. There are no clarified rules of
engagement. There is no timetable. There is no
legitimate definition of victory. There is no
contingency plan for mission creep. There is no clear
funding program. There is no agenda to bolster our
over-extended military. There is no explanation
defining what vital national interests are at stake.
There was no strategic plan for war when the President
started this thing, and there still is no plan today"
-Rep Tom Delay (R-TX)

"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for
the President to explain to us what the exit strategy
is."
-Governor George W Bush (R-TX)



To: JBTFD who wrote (697953)8/28/2005 3:35:56 AM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 769670
 
"dad's record of a 56% increase in just 4 years".

In a two-party-system, that is the way the original intent, intelligent creation, was supposed to be.

They, them two. must take turns, or then it becomes a one-party-system.

However, US supposedly had those check&balances in those four institutions, house-senate-president and the superior ones..

But it was always known that it could, and would go wrong.

Especially considering that funny gerrymandering of districts, which blessed US so much in the 1960-70s.

However, 1967 was funny as was 1962, when the idea of a pre-emptive air-strike was supported in the Pakistan-India dilemma, plus when the Shah was inserted into Iran.

That is, daddy Bush was really stupid when taking over after Reagan, who was somehow demented not to let Carter sorting out, but he had to consider Ford, Nixon and LBJ, plus Kennedy and Eisenhower...etc..

Will be interesting to see if that take-turns will continue, or if US actually has turned into a true one-party system.
(some say, the districts are gerrymandered like that for at least 25 years into the future)

lp2cd.com




To: JBTFD who wrote (697953)8/28/2005 3:39:12 AM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 769670
 
If US would re-introduce the original intent, intelligent design, idea of the vice-president from the other party, would that help??

Well, it could not make it worse??

lp2cd.com

With four major institutions, it goes totally, stochastically wrong, only once in 16.

With five, it is maybe only do that once every 32th term??

Introducing elections for the FEC might turn that into 64??

At a minimum, it would be easier to find something to blame..