Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (134267)	8/24/2005 10:11:22 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 793964

But what I meant by the question was, would you than consider it a legal matter? I already said that, too. <g> Is it a statement not a question? Does anyone care :) Interesting question. Well, maybe not. I don't know the answer. I would have used a question mark here on SI. It's instinctive. For a venue where someone might care, I'd restructure the sentence. Not really very much like that. I was comparing them on a different criterion, just one, the one I stated, which is that they all have in common that their jobs were all in jeopardy due to some decision they made post incident. Whether or not they have anything else in common is neither here nor there.