Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (107717)	8/25/2005 6:55:08 PM
From: epicure	Respond to of 108807

You cannot make that argument about WWII (that it's somehow the "same" as Iraq)- if you are sticking to international law, and interfering when other countries are invaded. A crucial difference between WWII and Iraq is that Iraq had not invaded anyone. The only people we were liberating Iraq from were Iraqis. Quite a large difference from Hitler taking over other countries in Europe. Easy to make a case for stopping Hitler once he invaded another country, impossible to make a legitimate case for the US invading Iraq for 9/11, imaginary WMD's or "regime change". And BTW we love China, and they brutally took over Tibet. Still, we love those Chinese goods, don't we?