SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (39116)8/26/2005 12:24:31 AM
From: deenoRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
ot

actually someone said, in the orginal post, a good number already have jobs but walmart was a better one. basically stating that the 5% unemplyment rate was very clos to full employment as some people are always transitioning. Makes some sense. You say NO WAY cause my gut says so and we have a bad president. Back it up with something or dont bother. Want to REALLY find out? call Walmart ask what % of resumes they got had people CURRENTLY working. Dont want to? oh well. I guess you just wanted to spout off some opinion as fact. Could you be right? maybe. I'm listening.



To: bentway who wrote (39116)8/26/2005 2:14:09 AM
From: David JonesRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
>>>>11,000 people showed up for 400<<<<

Years ago a friend and I tried to get a jobs as a fireman in San Jose. Thirty two hundred showed for twenty two positions.
Both of us were fully employed at the time.