Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DayTraderKidd who wrote (50232)	8/27/2005 10:25:44 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

There's nothing wrong with holding your government responsible, we should, but she's merely chanting the old and already debunked mantras we've all heard before, it's intellectually dishonest. She wants Bush to meet with her? Well, he already met with her last year and she said she was very satisfied after her meeting with him. She now wants a second meeting? What for? What changed? She's a troubled woman, naturally she lost her son, but she's now wearing a completely different hat. She's not the grieving mother, she's a protester and using her son's loss and the excuse to "justify" her mantras. This is where her problems begin. If she only needed comfort, it would be on thing, but her entire family has disowned her and her husband has filed for divorce. When will she get the message that her life is falling apart because of her own actions? If Bush had to go and meet with every protester in the country on demand, that would make absolutely no sense. GZ