Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (42018)	8/28/2005 10:21:14 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

.last time I checked Walter Reed does not pass legislation, so why the offensive signs in front of our fighting men and women? "28,000 Wounded" is an offensive sign? I suppose that you would have to ask the protestors why they are protesting in front of Walter Reed. But I suspect that it's related to the recent decision to close Walter Reed which will cost the government more money than by not closing it. Another sign: "Funding wounded not for war" seems to suggest that as a motivation. But perhaps you would prefer that the just throw the wounded out on the street and let them be homeless like we did with the Vietnam Vets. jttmab

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (42018)	8/28/2005 5:15:24 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Pictures of CODE PINK Commies protesting in front of Walter Reed Hospital.....last time I checked Walter Reed does not pass legislation, so why the offensive signs in front of our fighting men and women? Commies? What century are you from? The group sponsoring the protest are the Pink Ladies; hence their use of the color pink. This is also a group which claims they do not put up offensive signs for the troops to see.....they must be exposed for what they are. images12.fotki.com images12.fotki.com images12.fotki.com images9.fotki.com images12.fotki.com floodlight-findings.com; "No more casualties" "Funding wounded not for war" "Enlist here to die for Halliburton" You think these signs are offensive to the wounded? Huh? So you're saying you think the wounded at Walter Reed do want more casualties; they do not want funding to go to the wounded and they do want to die for Halliburton. What are you smoking? Here is an alleged "person of peace" giving the finger....makes you wonder if she even knows what a person of peace really is: floodlight-findings.com; Sorry, dude, but the link must not be working. I see no one.