To: Win Smith who wrote (107812 ) 8/28/2005 4:45:47 PM From: Brumar89 Respond to This fellow doesn't remember the problem "science" had with the big bang theory, which after almost 100 years is now accepted by all in the scientific community. For decades after Hubble originated it and Einstein accepted it, "scientists" defended the steady state theory because the idea that the entire universe had a beginning and came into being at one point in time and space sounded way too much like creation. Fortunately for physicists, there is no powerful motivation for such a band of mischief-makers to form. They don't have to spend much time persuading people that quantum physics and Einsteinian relativity really have been established beyond all reasonable doubt. We can't yet say what all the details of this process were, but real eyes representative of all the intermediate stages can be found, dotted around the animal kingdom, and we have detailed computer models to demonstrate that the creative process works just as the theory says. No intelligent designer would put such a clumsy arrangement .. consider an imaginary hypothesis of intelligent design that could explain the emergence of human beings on this planet:
