Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DayTraderKidd who wrote (50275)	8/28/2005 9:34:54 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

Don't you think that question has been answered many times over already? For someone to ask that question at this point seems kind of nutty... this is exactly what I meant when I said she chants old hackneyed mantras, she's not up to speed on anything... GZ

To: DayTraderKidd who wrote (50275)	8/28/2005 9:58:52 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

-Hmm - A topic I already know something about. I was in Crawford today and saw Cindy Sheenan. I did not talk with her but did talk with many of her advisors and entourage. The position on Osama Bin Laden as I heard it, pretty much straight from the horse's mouth, was that we don't know, and can't know if Osama was behind 9/11 because the issue has not been studied. The Bush league has consistently demanded that the public act first and think about it later. This is the great crime of the war in Iraq -- that any reasonable and comprehensive study of 9/11 is buried in the effort to link that great event with Saddam Hussain. Was Osama behind 9/11?? We only have Bush's word on that, and his word isn't worth a bucket of warm spit. It's time that Osama and Saddam are treated as the separate events they are and not as some purposly muddied mess. TP