SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (50281)8/29/2005 7:36:23 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
You say you have "a hunch" that bin laden was behind the 9/11 attack, well, so does everyone else, it doesn't take much to connect the dots here... also, how come he celebrates the attacks and does nothing to issue a public statement that he's not behind it? All his videos are filled with hate talk about America... as well, he had training camps in Afghanistan, everything pointed to bin laden, there is more than ample evidence far beyond any reasonable doubt that bin laden is directly responsible... I could also argue that clinton is also fully responsible for the 9/11 attacks because he didn't take bin laden into custody when being offered three times by the Sudanese government...

The Bush League does not want the public to learn who actually was behind 9/11 since it was not Saddam Hussain.

This is a completely unfounded hypothesis, you have no credible evidence whatsoever to support that statement... if you want to stand by your comment, then kindly show something credible...

GZ