Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (50284)	8/30/2005 11:10:05 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

he clearly and plainly admitted and took full credit for the attack... what more do you need? How do we know he is not just an attention seeker? People admit to every famous crime just to get their name in the history books. If Bush makes the case that Bin Laden led the attack then he destroys his rationale for invading Iraq, since Bin Laden and Saddam were bitter enemies and would not have been together on the plan. While that is an accurate conjecture, the much more likely case is that Bin Laden did indeed plan the attack and arrange financing and operatives. Saddam had absolutely nothing to do with it in spite of years of Bush lying on the subject. Bush will not support an accurate investigation because it will expose his own lies. TP