Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (66030)	8/29/2005 5:54:16 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

The problems in Iraq are now worse than when Saddam was in power. Bush and his supporters run away from this question. Is Iraq better off today than they were under Saddam? Under Saddam they had security and access to their basic necessities such as clean roads, water, electricity, the street security to send their young kids to school etc. Even the US was content with containing Saddam within the "no-fly" zone and ensuring that he kept all the warring factions together. And most important of all, he provided the buffer between Iran and Syria. Today, Iran owns the east and south east provinces of Iraq and Syria owns the western provinces (the Sunni ones).

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (66030)	8/30/2005 3:07:55 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 81568

Re: "Lied about the WMD, the available intelligence, nuclear weapons, (see the Downing Street Memo) and that Iraq was working with Al Qaeda. (see the 9-11 commission report)" Got some proof of that? Or just ranting about how obvious it is despite the total lack of any factual indication that it's true. Actually, thte 9-11 commission report proves you are wrong, to boot (despite the fact that you pretend it makes your statements true, it simply does not). Dan B.