Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (248413)	10/12/2005 6:55:52 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1582531

There is no reason why you should be able to say that she can or can't flaunt her wealth. Sure there is. You just set up policy such that unearned wealth can be spent, but not passed on to heirs in the form of inheritance. That is how, not why. I said there is no reason you should be able to say that she can or can't flaunt her wealth, not that there is no way to stop her. Clarification - By this I don't mean that you can't say pretty much whatever words you want. I am not attacking free speech. A better phrasing would be "There is no reason why you should be able to mandate that she can't flaunt her wealth.", or Perhaps "There is no reason why you should be able to forbid her from flaunting her wealth." Tim