SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (136167)9/2/2005 1:47:57 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
It was odd, but right after I asked the question about levees, FOX had a drawing of them....and then explained that the water was so MUCH over the top that everything flooded...One report they received said the water was 25 feet high, and the other was 29, so they averaged, and said 27 feet was many feet over what they were supposed to handle.

Also, several reports I heard today, while doing several other things, said that we are really dealing with two total disasters-- one was the hurricane itself which was Monday when it hit....and then Tuesday morning when the two levees broke and flooded everything VERY quickly.

So now we are dealing with the aftermath of TWO very, very bad events....



To: Ilaine who wrote (136167)9/2/2005 3:08:52 AM
From: Neeka  Respond to of 793838
 
A couple of theories on why the levees failed. Erosion undermined the bases and/or water seeped through seams. Not to mention the height of the surge was higher than the levee walls. I don't think we'll know what happened until the water recedes and the Corp can do an thorough inspection.