Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (42553)	9/1/2005 3:31:38 PM
From: J.B.C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

You know you guy's are great. I'm willing to admit that there may not have been another source of funding. I heard it on a radio show, I can't find any document to back it up. So perhaps what I heard was incorrect. Why is it that this countries history began to you on January 21st, 2001? Why weren't the levees fixed on Clinton's watch (they were inadequate then)? Why wasn't Osama bin laden taken when it was offered to Clinton? The left offers no solution. Bitch about deficits then cry when 1 in 1000 event happens happens like Katrina. The left's environmentalist have left us with little margin in a very complex energy pipeline. Denied us the ability to drill in ANWAR, prevented us from building additional refinery capacity. Then complain about $3.00 gas. This will be the death of the extreme environmental movement. I want you guys to keep talking. As you do, it becomes obvious to the intellectual left that their party has left the building. All you guy's can do is call the CIC a chimp and call intelligent people like myself idiots. I suggest you go take a good look in the mirror before you start your ad hominem attacks. I now consider you not worth my time, good day. Jim

To: bentway who wrote (42553)	9/1/2005 3:40:16 PM
From: Ron	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93284

Sayyy.. this thread still going strong I see. Here's a little somethin new: democrats.com Gentlemen, I'm blogging on the reasons why no polling organizations have followed up on the June poll by Zogby which found "42% say they would favor impeachment proceedings if it is found the President misled the nation about his reasons for going to war with Iraq." zogby.com This follows the final report that there were no WMD's in Iraq in 2003. It also follows the revelations in the Downing Street Memos that the "intelligence and facts were fixed around the policy" of invading Iraq. After the Lewinsky scandal broke, only 26% of Americans favored impeachment of President Clinton. Yet dozens of polls included this question: democrats.com In recent days, conservatives like Pat Buchanan have also called for Bush's impeachment. humaneventsonline.com Can you explain why the Post did not ask a question about impeachment in its latest poll? Were you asked not to include such a question, either by senior editors or Republican officials?