Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (40006)	9/1/2005 6:13:39 PM
From: Amy J	Respond to of 306849

Totally agree with you. They should build a brand new city elsewhere, rather than rebuilding the old one. That area is just going to get reflooded again and again. Doesn't make sense to rebuild it there. This would be a good opportunity for us to build a city as modern as one of China's brand new ones, with all the hightech advances some of their new buildings have. If an earthquake striked San Francisco and wiped out all of the buildings, I would bet you many people would jump at the opportunity to have a city built elsewhere, away from earthquake zone. Imagine a new city built from scratch, with good city planning, and better transportation lines and better traffic planning and better buildings equipped with modern high-technology. edit: On a different note, what's up with our govt not sending a platoon of helicopters to drop off airborn food/water supplies to the starving people? How strange our govt can't even drop off supplies from the air, when our govt does this overseas all the time.