Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (36303)	9/3/2005 1:28:27 AM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361165

Some recent comments from General Wesley Clark - a man who I wish we had as our President right now... tpmcafe.com by wclark on Sep 01, 2005 -- 01:26:33 PM EST It's not clear yet whether or not the deployment of National Guard units from Louisiana to Iraq had any significant impact on the initial response to the crisis. But what is clear is that even with more than 36 hours of warning of the approaching storm, federal officials -- including the President -- simply failed to exercise proper planning and prudence in preparing to cope with a potential disaster well-understood within FEMA as ranking among the highest risks we could confront, namely the damage to New Orleans. There's no problem in evidence in New Orleans thus far that couldn't have been dealt with through proper foresight and preparation. National Guard troops could have been staged; tens of thousands of people could have been evacuated; police could have been pre-positioned to stop looting; refugee shelters could have been identified, stocked, and prepared. All of this was possible. What was primarily missing was the leadership, vision, and will to get it done. I think it's appropriate that states have a militia in addition to the National Guard, but the urge for public service should come from within. Every able-bodied American should seek out opportunities for public service. There are such opportunities available now, through the Department of Homeland Security as well as other kinds of local volunteer organizations which prepare and train for disaster response. It remains to be seen what happened with such organizations in this case. Wes

To: TigerPaw who wrote (36303)	9/3/2005 4:14:34 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 361165

9/11 in New Orleans huffingtonpost.com By Paul Loeb 09/02/2003 We’re told the 9/11 attacks changed everything for America--that they ushered us in to a new and more dangerous world, where we could no longer afford old illusions. If we take its full lessons, the disaster of Hurricane Katrina challenges us even more profoundly. If the comparison seems overstated, the death tolls from Katrina may well exceed the number of those lost at the World Trade Center and Pentagon. The projected cost of rebuilding New Orleans and its surroundings is now projected at $25 billion and may even approach the $40 billion paid out by insurance companies worldwide related to the 9/11 attacks. And while New York City beyond the Twin Towers remained intact, a refuge to flee to and base from which to assemble emergency resources, New Orleans is a sea of desolation, a wet and desperate landscape with no place to hide. New York City and the national economy rebounded relatively quickly from the attacks. The New Orleans projections are far grimmer. 9/11, we were told, required Americans to place unprecedented trust in their president and his advisors, and to scrap longstanding rules of international law and domestic liberties. It justified a preemptive war against Iraq and Bush’s reelection, despite all his failures. Of course it might never have occurred if the US hadn’t supported bin Laden to begin with, or if our policies hadn’t so embittered the Islamic world that a small number of men were willing to murder 3,000 innocent people. But we’d all agree the attacks had a profound global impact. So what are the lessons of New Orleans? We may call hurricanes acts of God, but Katrina was a level 1 storm, the lowest, until blistering temperatures in the Gulf of Mexico supercharged it to level 5. The storm’s virulence was related to global climate warming just as surely as the recent forest fires that ravaged Southern California, floods that covered much of Bangladesh, and European heat waves that killed 35,000 people two summers ago. Ironically, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour played a key role, as an energy lobbyist, in convincing the Bush administration to break its campaign promise to support limits on the carbon dioxide emissions that fuel global warming. This disaster was fueled by more than global climate change. Engineers and software writers talk of “common mode failures,” where one mistake magnifies another and the cumulative impact is greater than all the separate parts. The New Orleans levees might never have been breached had the Bush administration not reversed Clinton administration policies prohibiting development of coastal wetlands that once buffered the impact of storms. The levees might have been buttressed and repaired had the administration responded to a 2001 FEMA study warning that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the three most likely disasters in the U.S. But instead of honoring the Army Corps of Engineers’ request to strengthen and renovate levees and pumping stations, the Bush administration cut the flood control budget of the New Orleans Corps of Engineers by $71 million, 44 percent of its budget. They needed the money for the Iraq war and to give $130 billion a year of tax cuts to a tiny group of wealthy Americans. Finally, this catastrophe built on the slow-burn disaster that’s been hitting America’s poorest communities for decades. The wealthy and comfortable could evacuate New Orleans and did, though their lives were severely disrupted. But in one of the nation’s poorest cities, vast numbers of citizens had nowhere to go, no transportation or money with which to leave, and no friends or relatives with extra space to house them. They are the people left desperately trying to get out, while the helicopters and resources of a third of the Louisiana National Guard are deployed in Iraq. And they will be the ones most damaged and most forgotten when the floodwaters eventually recede. We’re told we had to change in the wake of 9/11 or face future terrorist attacks. I suspect there will still be more attacks on American soil, following London and Madrid, and that our Iraqi invasion makes this far more likely. But it’s also probable that unless we change, New Orleans will not be the last of America’s great cities to collapse in desperation and ruin. Immediate relief efforts are critical, but we also need to address root crises: global warming, runaway development, deterioration of critical infrastructure, and a malign neglect that leaves more and more Americans poor and desperate. A year ago, the world’s second largest reinsurance company, Swiss Re, warned that the economic costs of climate-related disasters threatened to reach $150 billion a year within ten years. We’re already seeing storms of exceptional virulence accompanying the heating of our oceans by a single degree. What will be the level of destruction as global temperatures continue to increase? The development patterns that destroyed Louisiana wetlands are being repeated throughout America, with the support of an administration intent on removing all limits on private economic activity. The aging levees are part of a deteriorating national infrastructure that will take billions of dollars to address. The poverty that leaves people helpless to respond to disasters of whatever kind continues to grow, accelerated by government policies that transfer resources away from the poorest. 9/11 may have indeed changed our world forever, though I think we’ve drawn the wrong lessons. We now have a chance to heed those of New Orleans and Katrina, with consequences potentially far worse if we don’t. It’s up to us how we respond to the power of this warning.