Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (36322)	9/3/2005 3:54:10 AM
From: SiouxPal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 361116

Well first off please don't include Bill Clinton with anybody. Do you, a most intelligent cognitive man think he's gone goofy? Please don't include him with Kerry. Not to say anything derogatory about John. Just two different people. Bill can't do his total thing now. He is still the smartest man who has been president. He has the facts to back him up. He walks in the streets with minimal security. America likes him more very day as he contrasts with George. Powerful men don't always have to show that. He's just not overshadowing the viable opponents who can be elected president. They will beg him to campaign for them. I damn sure would. He exudes power.

To: stockman_scott who wrote (36322)	9/3/2005 12:48:25 PM
From: techguerrilla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361116

Clinton and Kerry have been virtually worthless in setting up an effective opposition to the chimp administration and its crimes. I remember back in 1996 when my great labor law professor at UNC said to me quite simply that Clinton was "a Democratic George Bush." I never saw any action by Clinton that he was a traditional Democrat or liberal. Kerry was little more than "Bush lite" in the 2004 campaign, claiming he would have voted for the Iraq Resolution (H.J. Res. 114) even had he known then that there were no weapons of mass destruction. It is time for serious Democrats to start challenging the Bush crime family. Merely associating with them at this point is aiding and abetting. Clinton was effective, at times, during his presidency only at holding off the fundamentalist insanity of the right wing. He was incapable--after eight years of purported prosperity--of turning over power to another Democrat. I was not a big fan of Bill Clinton. He allowed way too many shady practices of Wall Street that helped lead to the tech crash of April 2000 and the loss of my entire life's savings. I can't blame that on Bush. /john