SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (137114)9/4/2005 5:12:58 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793970
 
I don't think it's so simple. You'd have to have police protection for the busses and some priority scheme for who gets to get on.

That's my point. By Sunday, when the evacuation was ordered, it was too late to organize a bus evac. It would have had to be "ad hoc." If I had been driving a bus, I would have been slowly going through the projects, honking a horn, and saying, "Families and women with children only."

You could not do anything Monday, the storm had hit.

By Tuesday Morning, it looked like the bullet had missed, and everybody relaxed.

By Wednesday, the local buses were underwater.



To: Lane3 who wrote (137114)9/4/2005 5:17:12 PM
From: Bill Ulrich  Respond to of 793970
 
The city authoritities probably "questionized" themselves into inaction, too. Meanwhile, a 20-year old kid "requisitioned" a bus, filled it up with people and left. That's action.



To: Lane3 who wrote (137114)9/4/2005 5:21:19 PM
From: Constant Reader  Respond to of 793970
 
Yes, you do go on TV and tell people there is going to be a disaster. I mean, really, what do people think an evacuation order means? It isn't: "BTW, if you have a spare moment, why not hop in your car and toodle up to Shreveport for the day because we might get a little wind and rain." It means: "Get out of town. Now."

I've read lots of reasons for doing nothing when someone should have been doing something. But nobody tried and people died.