To: Ilaine who wrote (262 ) 9/5/2005 12:18:19 AM From: aladin Respond to of 1118 CB, I understand your distraught, but your way off the mark. For Example:Chertoff said FEMA is not equipped to send large numbers of people to help during a disaster. Instead, he said, "FEMA basically plugs in to the existing state and local infrastructure. What happened here was, essentially, the demolishment of that state and local infrastructure and, I think, that really caused a cascading series of breakdowns." The lessons from Katrina may result in a change in the way FEMA responds to such emergencies, moving from playing a supportive role to playing a more central role, he said. "We're going to see a lot of things we put in place worked well," he said. "There are some things which did not work well." Sen. Mary Landrieu told CBS's "Face the Nation" that she had no time to consider blame while rescue operations are ongoing. "Quite frankly that discussion is getting in the way," the Louisiana Democrat said. You basically are bypassing all local and state responsibilities and dumping all blame on the Federal Government. Katrina destroyed a lot more than New Orleans, and quite frankly the local breakdowns are hard to understand. Here in NC, we had two major hurricanes in the late 90's. One (Floyd) flooded far worse than Katrina albeit in a more rural area. No one in NC shot at CG Helicopters or at any National Guard Troops. No troops were necessary to replace local police. They basically did rescue. Come to think of it - I can't remember any location around the country doing this (shooting at rescuers). To take your view to its logical conclusion - Congress should void existing laws and appoint some commission to evaluate local and state governments. When NOAA predicts a big storm heading to a deficient locale - the Feds should step in ahead of time and take over municipal and state governments. Or do you have some specific suggestions?