SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (102359)9/6/2005 10:09:42 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 132070
 
Party Poker's growth slowing. today.reuters.com I was also surprised to see it was a company I own, SportingBet.Com, who was bidding for EmpireOnline, not Party. I have no idea how that fits. Empire shares Party's platform as a "skin". It seems unlikely that the owner of ParadisePoker will be welcome to operate on the Party Poker system. Also, Party can cut off Empire at any time, and joining up with Sportingbet would provide ample reason to do so. BTW, note that Party's "declining" revenues were up 89% in the first half.

I play at both Paradise and Empire.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (102359)9/9/2005 9:23:02 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Hi KT; Re: "Carl, I played against what I was certain was a robot on PokerRoom this weekend. The player raised before the flop every time and didn't chat at all. He also folded if raised at the river, after bluffing all the way. He lost all of his money in about an hour."

That does sound like a robot player. But do you think that that is the best a robot player can be?

Carl


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News