SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Lake New Orleans -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jack Russell who wrote (531)9/7/2005 9:50:18 PM
From: sandintoes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1118
 
Agreed, how was it that Mississippi and Alabama with a much wider area of devastation immediately went to work on the rescue of the people who stayed?



To: Jack Russell who wrote (531)9/8/2005 12:01:57 AM
From: aladin  Respond to of 1118
 
Jack,

I agree totally that the LA locals could have done better, but we are seeing that the normal 4 to 9 day federal response no longer seems adequate.

Remember Andrew? That took 9 days to get under control and a lot of reform occurred and now we see this one at 4 days.

Local governments (outside of Florida and NC which have LOTS of practice) are not up to this - and yes I agree that MS did handle things better.

My issue is that you can not depend on local Mayors, County Exec's and State officials to do this when they see something like this once a generation.

I would probably base the entire process on what works in Florida - just putting it in writing so that each level of Government knows what it is responsible for and when. On the issue of the big dangerous storms - I am suggesting we change procedure to get some proactive response going.

The NG General in charge of such a response could easily still be under the local Governor if everyone agreed, but would have authority to call in Federal assistance under a previously agreed framework. We don't need to be negotiating separation of powers during a crisis.

John