SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (306)9/8/2005 3:23:00 AM
From: energyplay  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 217657
 
US Government intervention in stock markets - it is too flippant to say "well, duh, of course" one can make number of reasonable cases for the occasional need for intervention.

Nobody worries about governments intervening in foreign exchange markets to maintain sertain exchange ratios and reduce volitiliy, of central banks buying and selling to shape a yield curve.

As long as intervention is directed at broad sectors, and rarely at specific firms (save the strategic ones like Boeing, Yukos, PetroChina, AirBus, BP, CNOOC, Air France, etc.) I don't see much of a problem...



To: TobagoJack who wrote (306)9/8/2005 5:36:54 AM
From: A Horse With No Name  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217657
 
my question is why did the fed allow the nasdaq to fall 80 percent if they were intervening all this time.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (306)9/9/2005 12:52:05 AM
From: Taikun  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217657
 
More of the visible hand:

Cops caught looting by a reporter in N.O.

frycookonvenus.com