SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (700804)9/9/2005 4:26:28 AM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Using your source

As said, it was a conservative source that I threw out as a bone for the other side to chew on. The source uses all the scientific spin he can muster to throw water on the idea of global warming. He even suggests that warming from Industry in England upsets the the value of the data from history. i.e. that human activity does not create heat.

You need a particular mindset to think like that.

I am a student of science. I have seen what influential but mistaken (paid stooges) scientists can do. You yourself must have watched the statisticians argue into the face of all the real statistical data how smoking tobacco does not harm your health during in the 1960's.

Global warming is a fact. I have not argued one iota about weather it was caused by human activity or not.

You are seen to be going out of you way to discredit the work of countless thousands of hard working scientists. Even all those employed by the USA government.

As said. It takes a particular mindset to think like that.



To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (700804)9/9/2005 7:39:08 AM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
I have seen no analysis presented

Well, you must be looking hard in the wrong direction.

I have mentioned to Bill that my theory of a global warming trend rests on the case that mean sea level is rising.

Science is based on numerical measurements. If there is anything human beings have measured frequently, it's how deep the water is.

Would you consider this data set to be reliable ?

csr.utexas.edu