Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: manny_velasco who wrote (22883)	9/9/2005 12:38:47 PM
From: SI Bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32882

I cut/pasted what I was provided by Anthony himself, which appear to be an Opposition and Affadavit filed in August. The PDF links I posted this morning are the same and support this. I really can't (or care to) determine the accuracy of the calculations or the competency of the person who prepared the Opposition motion, but I'd assume they're more competent in such things than I am. I did, however, see the spreadsheet that was used to come up with the calculations and noticed that a very high percentage of the alledgedly ill-gotten gains were from SEVU. That one I'm a bit familiar with because of run-ins I had with Francois Goelo, who was touting it on iHub and here and who got the boot for repeatedly deleting posts on iHub that didn't break the rules, but that he claimed were "untrue". I know that Anthony started shorting it at $10 and am quite certain this was before he supposedly got information he shouldn't have from FBI agents. Not real clear on the timelines. I remember he covered it when Richard McBride (it's CEO?) died. He covered at $0.9375. Does SEVU trade under a different ticker now? I can't get a quote for that ticker.