Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (700953)	9/9/2005 1:34:51 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

and explain all the scientific spin you are talking about. OK. Your other post to me suggested using direct temperature measurement to study any possible change in average global temperature. An actual measure of temperature from a global perspective seems a far far simpler and direct indication of global temperature and by definition be the most accurate indicator of global temperature change. far far eh? Temperature is a difficult measurement in the first place. Calibration is difficult as a standard is difficult to arrive at. If you are going to discuss any measurements with a right wing person, who has a political agenda to defend, he can come up with all sorts of ways to dispute the data. The standard for feet, inches, centimeters, and meters is well established though. Hard to B/S your way out of any observed trends. Hence my argument using mean sea level increases as the basis that there is a global warming trend.