SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: russwinter who wrote (41244)9/9/2005 9:15:20 PM
From: ild  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
DJ Fitch Doesn't See Bond Insurers Affected By Katrina

09/09 15:30 *DJ Fitch Doesn't See Bond Insurers Affected By Katrina

09/09 15:43 DJ Fitch Doesn't See Bond Insurers Affected By Katrina

By Stan Rosenberg

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Fitch Ratings said Friday it doesn't expect its financial strength ratings for bond insurers to be affected by credit deterioration or losses related to Hurricane Katrina.

The hurricane that tore through the Gulf Coast on Aug. 29 already has caused rating agencies Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's Corp. to place about $9.5 billion of bonds from Louisiana and Mississippi municipalities and agencies - as well as bonds of the states themselves - on watch for possible downgrade.

Many of the bonds are insured against default by the bond insurers, raising questions about their financial standing should they have to pay out large volumes of claims.

09/09 16:32 DJ Fitch Doesn't See Bond Insurers Affected By Katrina -2

Fitch, which covers 10 insurers, said it knows of "several instances" of missed debt service payments by insured entities but described the amounts as " immaterial." Some of the missed payments also apparently took place before the hurricane struck and before their Sept. 1 payment date.

The rating agency didn't put any numbers on the missed payments.

"Fitch believes liquidity claims could increase in subsequent payment periods as these payments have yet to be remitted to the trustees," analyst Thomas J. Abruzzo said in a statement.

Many municipal bond issues, however, contain reserve funds from which debt service on bonds can be paid for a specified period of time, Abruzzo said. These reserves usually are created at the time of issuance and frequently cover six months to a year, according to analysts.

"Of course, of critical importance is the longer-term ability of the underlying issuers to re-establish infrastructure and resume revenue-generating capabilities to help service their debt," Fitch said.

Fitch said other types of bonds, such as mortgage-backed securities, also may be impacted by Katrina, but it anticipated the diverse nature of the collateral behind these transactions would limit credit deterioration or incurred losses.

While most bonds have underlying ratings, those that are insured against default take on the financial strength ratings of the insurers. Most are rated AAA, although some carry AA and A ratings.

The insurers rated by Fitch are MBIA Insurance Corp., Ambac Assurance Corp., Financial Security Assurance Inc., Financial Guaranty Insurance Co., XL Capital Assurance Inc., XL Financial Assurance Ltd., Assured Guaranty Corp., Assured Guaranty Re International Ltd., CIFG Guaranty and Radian Asset Assurance Inc.

09/09 17:19 DJ Fitch Doesn't See Bond Insurers Affected By Katrina -3

Fitch's assessment stood in contrast to a statement Wednesday by Standard & Poor's that said five of the bond insurers "are clearly facing uncertainty" because of the size of their exposure in the Gulf Coast region.

Nine primary bond insurers have $13.8 billion of exposure to municipal bond issuers whose creditworthiness may have been affected by Katrina, S&P said.

While four of those companies had a "low likelihood of suffering rating stress," details of changes in credit quality to various insured issuers will determine how susceptible each of the other five are, said S&P analyst Dick Smith.

Even so, he said, it would take a lot to threaten any of the companies. A scenario that resulted in rating downgrades for insured issuers of up to two notches, combined with short-term rating defaults, "will not likely threaten any of those companies' ratings," Smith said.

By short-term defaults, he said he was referring to those that could be promptly corrected, such as payments missed because an issuer suffered flood damage and couldn't get into its office as opposed to more serious problems like the disappearance of the revenue base backing certain bond issues.

The five companies "facing uncertainty" are ACA Financial, Ambac, Financial Guaranty, Financial Security and MBIA, Smith said. The insurers at low risk were Assured Guaranty, CIFG, Radian Asset and XL Capital.

In response to a question, Smith said it would be "premature" to put the companies on watch for a downgrade. "It's just not known what the level of claims could be from their exposure at this point. To put them on watch and materially impact their business, when in fact this thing may play out in a way that there is no real problem, may be overkill," he said.



To: russwinter who wrote (41244)9/9/2005 9:54:45 PM
From: orkrious  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
I haven't posted a Lance Lewis piece in almost two months and tonight's is a good one. Note junk spreads were flat today.

dailymarketsummary.com

Stocks Remain Convinced That A “Pause” Is Coming



Asia was mostly higher overnight, with Japan picking up over a percent ahead of its elections this weekend. We also saw the highest volume ever on the Japanese market last night, which is noteworthy. Europe was up a touch this morning, and the US futures were higher as usual.

We gapped up at the open in the S&Ps, had a little pullback, and then launched about half a percent over the next couple hours to our high of the day, which was just shy of the August peak. We finally leveled out in the last couple hours and went sideways, but we still finished basically right on the best levels of the day. The media will say that oil and gasoline corrected a little, but the bottom line is that people are convince a Fed pause is coming, and they think it’s the best thing since sliced bread. Volume picked up a bit once again (1.5 bil on the NYSE and 1.6 bil on the NASDAQ). Breadth was over 2 to 1 positive on the NYSE and slightly less than 2 to 1 on the NASDAQ.

INTC’s midquarter update was a giant yawn, as the company merely narrowed the range of its revenue guidance but left the midpoint unchanged. INTC fell 3 percent to a 5-month low. TXN, however, guided EPS up to 38 cents from 36 cents and guided revenue up to a midpoint of $3.55 bil from $3.425 bil. Like NSM, TXN cited robust handset chip demand. TXN, however, ended merely flat after opening higher.

The rest of the chips were a mixed bag and mostly up or down a percent. The equips were also mostly higher by a percent or two. The SOX rose nearly a percent.

The rest of tech was mostly higher, but rather unremarkable,

The financials were higher. The BKX rose just a touch, and the XBD rose over a percent to a new high. The derivative king rose half a percent. C rose just a touch, and BAC was off a hair. GE rose just a touch.

AIG rose over 2 percent. ABK and MBI both picked up over a percent. The mortgage lenders were up a percent or two across the board. FRE rose a hair, and FNM rose just a touch.

Retailers were (you guessed it…) higher, as the RTH rose a percent. TGT rose half a percent, and BBY rose 2 percent.

Yesterday’s HOV-inspired tumble was completely forgotten today, as the homies snapped back and were up 2 to 4 percent across the board. The HGX housing index actually even made a marginal new high for the week as if yesterday never even happened. If the homebuilders get back into gear to the upside, it would obviously support the entire stock market potentially moving higher once again. I can’t believe that’s actually going to happen, but the market seems convinced that the Fed will pause and that the housing bubble might be “OK” as a result.

In the real world, however, we continue to see signs that the housing bubble has already popped, so a pause isn’t going to do much for people that stuck with overpriced real estate. Take today’s Condo Uh-Oh, which appeared in the NY Post. According to the story, “The average price of a Manhattan apartment has dropped from $1.332 million in June to $1.145 million by the end of August — more than 14 percent, according to the latest monthly report by the Halstead real-estate company.”

The TRAN was off a percent and fell to a new low for the move thanks to a warning from YELL. YELL, which is a trucker, warned that earnings would be off 12 percent. Three percent of the 12 percent miss was attributed to damage from Katrina, while the remaining 9 percent was attributed to “implementation challenges for new processes”. The company notably insisted that traffic had not yet slowed down yet. Nevertheless, YELL was smoked for 7 percent to a new low. JBHT was hit in sympathy and fell 2 percent.

Crude oil fell 41 cents to $64.08 and back to just shy of yesterday’s lows. As more data comes out, it appears that at least 13 percent or so of total Gulf oil production will be offline through year-end at minimum. We’ve also learned that at least 4 refineries are going to be offline for several months. Despite oil and gasoline coming in some recently, this is obviously going to provide continued supply problems. The only question is what will demand be like, and that’s going to depend on the economy (i.e.- the housing bubble).

The XOI was once again unbothered by crude’s decline and rallied nearly 3 percent to a new high. The XNG rose over 2 percent to a new high, and the OSX rose 2 percent and back to just shy of its recent high. The JOC industrial commodity index rose a percent to another new high. Everything we have read coming out of the Fed suggests that they are going to keep tightening, but given the stock market’s continued rally, I am becoming increasingly worried that I am wrong and that the Fed is indeed going to try and monetize the supply shock that we have seen in energy and many other commodities as well as the coming flood of spending by the Federal government by meeting it with easier monetary policy. And that means inflation is going to accelerate. The XLB rose a percent and may now be set to climb off its lows for the year once again.

Gold opened flat in the US and rallied to as high as $453.60, or just shy of yesterday’s high before finally slipping a touch into the close end up $2.30 to $453.40. The COT revealed after the close that the net spec long position rose only 5000 contracts to 149,000 contracts, which is much lower than I thought we would see. It’s difficult to say that it’s “bullish” because it’s still high, but it does indicate that further upside is possible, especially if I am wrong and the Fed pauses like everybody seems to think they will.

The HUI rose over 2 percent to a new high for the move since the May low. With the shares having made a new high for the move, gold will more than likely make a new high for the move of its own next week. The XAU/gold ratio also made a new 5-month high, so the shares are outperforming the metal once again, which is bullish. It’s hard to believe that the entire gold complex has changed character so violently since 1 day after Katrina when everybody began expecting the Fed to “pause”, but that’s what we are seeing.

Based on everything I have read from the Fed thus far, “pausing” does not appear to be on the table in September, but the stock market seems absolutely convinced that a pause is indeed what lies ahead. If they’re right, and I am wrong, the Fed will be meeting an energy shock and massive fiscal spending with easy monetary policy (exactly what Uncle Al claimed the Fed shouldn’t do the Saturday before Katrina hit). This is exactly the mistake that was made by the Fed in the 1970s, when we had a similar short-term oil shock, namely the Arab embargo. What’s even more amazing is that Uncle Al cited this very mistake as something “not to do” just 2 days before Katrina hit!

We had been looking for the gold shares to begin their next leg up wherever the Fed began to ease once again or perhaps even simply stopped raising interest rates, both of which I thought would only come after some sort of negative event occurred in the financial markets, which is what typically happens. If, on the other hand, the Fed pauses now because of Katrina, that could be our signal that it’s time to get bullish on gold and its shares once again.

I haven’t done anything about it yet myself, but I may begin buying some of the shares next week for those that care. The HUI is basically flat on the year still, so it’s not like we’ve missed much. We’ll see how things go, but if this Fed really is actually irresponsible enough to stop raising interest rates in the face of an obvious inflationary shock and massive fiscal spending, it’s going to be time to put on the gold bull hat once again. Technical confirmation won’t come until the HUI can break out of its 2003-2004 downtrend line around 250ish, but I’d rather not wait that long before adding some exposure.

The housing bubble is rolling over, and it will slow the economy. So, at some point the stock market is still going to crater. That slide will still no doubt hit the gold shares as well just like it always does, but the shares could be much higher by the time that slide comes, as was the case in 2001, 2002, etc. when the gold shares merely corrected in their bull trends as the stock market made new lows. In the meantime, with the S&Ps remaining firm, it’s supportive of a rally in the HUI, and given that it’s an inflationary rally, the HUI (and the oil shares) will likely outperform the rest of the stock market if any rally occurs.

The US dollar index fell just a touch. The yen rose nearly a percent on optimism over this weekend’s elections and its stock market, which remains on fire. The euro, however, was virtually flat. If the Fed is crazy enough to “pause”, I’m more bullish on gold than foreign currencies, because I’m still not sure how everything will play out with interest rate differentials, US corporate repatriations due to the Patriot Act, etc. But a “pause” will certainly open the door to renewed downside risk in the dollar. Next week we’ll get both the July trade deficit and the August PPI on Tuesday (the CPI is Thursday), given the rise in energy prices in August, it’s a good bet that these inflationary numbers will come in hot, and a Fed pause is only going to appear that much more inflationary as a result. The trade deficit will no doubt be a whopper as well. So, early next week could be very interesting.

Treasuries were higher, with the yield on the 10yr slipping to 4.123%. The 2/10 spread narrowed slightly to 24 bps, but that’s still a long way away from the 10bps that we were at pre-Katrina. Given all of the massive Katrina-related spending that the Federal government plans and the energy supply shock we’ve had, a Fed “pause” is likely to be greeted with selling in the long end of the bond market (because the Fed will be inflating), which is only going to put further pressure on the housing bubble.

The 10yr junk spread to treasuries was flat. Since I doubt a pause by the Fed is going to alter the course of the housing bubble, which already appears to be rolling over, I doubt a pause will change the direction of spreads much. They should continue to widen.

The equity put/call fell to .51, so call buyers obviously continue to fully embrace the “pause” rally.

Despite a lot of evidence to the contrary, the stock market appears to be absolutely convinced that the Fed is done. Housing is all that matters for the economy and the stock market, and a Fed pause won’t change the fact that the housing market has already rolled over. But such a pause could generate one last narrow rally in the stock market that is led by inflationary plays.

Stocks are overbought and the leadership continues to be extremely narrow. Oils, foreign ETFs, and scattered commodity shares continue to be the upside leaders, while the rest of the market merely bounces around. Nevertheless, if the Fed (in direct contrast to everything it has said) does indeed “pause” when it meets on the 20th, those stocks that are bouncing from lower levels (like virtually all of the Dow stocks) will continue to “bounce”, and the oil and gas shares will no doubt make new highs… all of which could push the S&Ps to one more new high, which is now what I expect we’re likely to see within the next 2 weeks. After that it may be “all she wrote”, but for now, the “pause” rally seems to be on whether we believe it or not.



To: russwinter who wrote (41244)9/10/2005 1:56:01 AM
From: basho  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Russ, first post here.

I've been keeping the FCB holding data for about 2 years so my annual change data only starts in early September last year. It kicked off then at $330 billion and declined pretty steadily to $210 billion in mid-Feb this year. It then went roughly sideways until late July before starting a fresh and steady decline which has taken it to its current $176 billion.

I noticed something kind of interesting, though. For much of the last year non-M2 M3 looks quite strongly inversely correlated to FCB holdings. Could FCB funds be finding their way into this category through large deposits in the banking system? Certainly this is where most of the monetary growth has occurred for quite a while.



To: russwinter who wrote (41244)9/10/2005 9:04:54 AM
From: Ramsey Su  Respond to of 110194
 
Russ,

Janet Yellens was in San Diego last week and a friend of mine went to listen to her. This is part of the email he sent me summarizing her presentation:

.......Janet Yellin is a very well educated, experienced economist and central banker. She may be in line to succeed Mr. Greenspan.

Like he, she speaks volumes and says absolutely nothing.

Not even when asked a direct question, like, "Do you now consider global monetary statistics in setting domestic monetary policy?" does she answer.

She built a very strong case for a suspension of short term interest rates hikes as a result of disruption from the hurricane.

Then she demolished that argument and built an equally strong case for continued measured increases in rates.


I only know one certain outcome. The person who replaces Greenspan is an idiot. Only idiot would want that job under the present circumstances.