Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandintoes who wrote (39966)	9/9/2005 9:47:19 PM
From: Jagfan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

No,No,NO. You are mistaken, If you are logical there, you get banned. They have no use for logic or facts.

To: sandintoes who wrote (39966)	9/9/2005 10:50:36 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 90947

The thread header is fairly straight forward: "This thread is dedicated to all that feel we were cheated from a better President than George W. Bush is or will be." There is one primary yet unstated rule... the four Bs: "Bash Bush or Be Banned" If you don't accept this presupposition you shouldn't expect to post without being banned. It has little to do with logic. You can be very logical or completely off the wall with wild conspiracy theories and lame innuendo, as long as you remember to include the obligatory 4Bs in your posting repertoire. Sioux's own thread members have criticised him for what they call the Bate and Ban gambit to create a little drama for the thread (I think he has stopped doing that). It is where he kisses up to you in PMs while inviting you to post on his thread, then bans you when you show up.