To: i-node who wrote (250782 ) 9/10/2005 3:01:37 PM From: tejek Respond to of 1573911 Absurd? Its been the policy of the US for nearly a hundred years. It dates from frontier times when your neighbor helped you in a time of need. And its been in the bible for at least two millennia. It has never been the "policy" of the US, or any other government in history, that it will take primary responsibility for saving people in a natural disaster. I refer you again to the FEMA website. Why do you think we pay taxes? So Mr. Bush can take a five week vacation? I don't think so. There is no excuse for this ignorance. Obviously, government does what it can do. But some natural disasters are so big, and of a nature such that government simply cannot swoop in and solve the problem. The best we can hope for is that people will be responsible (which includes local government officials) in evacuating and providing for their on survival until such time as government can mount a reasonable rescue effort. Sometimes that may be in hours, and in more devastating situations, days or even weeks. I have said before that their response effort is indefensible. In fact, poor execution has been the hallmark of this administration.It is impressive that, in the biggest natural disaster in US history, that government was able to evacuate the entire city so quickly, etc. While we shouldn't gloss over the failures, we certainly should give credit where it is due. Five days after the event took place and with most of the free world screaming at them? Sorry, I am not impressed. So many people are separated from their children, several websites have had to be set up to locate children and the news media are also acting as an intermediary. Many people want to get back to NO and are thousands of miles away.....they have no idea where they will get the money to get back. Many people were put on planes but had no idea where they were going. What you call an "impressive" success seems more like a desperate attempt to right a bad wrong.Look, if Mike Brown was truly a problem in not cutting red tape, then Chertoff has taken the appropriate action. Nobody has said it is a perfect process; perhaps Brown was unable to balance the need for "red tape" (i.e., accountability) vs. the need for immediacy. But I've yet to see any evidence that the federal government reacted inappropriately. As always, you are entitled to your opinion.