Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (108341)	9/11/2005 12:14:57 PM
From: John Carragher	Respond to of 108807

Subject 53920 try this thread ,, lindybill runs a pretty tight ship. no mud slinging or you get kicked out. both sides present views without attacks. thread is more right than left... maybe 70/30 but at least you can pick some information and not have to worry about slander.

To: Suma who wrote (108341)	9/11/2005 4:13:57 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Respond to of 108807

Hello Suma. I recall you posting on the John Kerry thread during 2004. I am still moderating that thread and you may have noticed that my ban list went from 50 to 0. But notice that I have used more filth myself after I removed the ban list. And I have used it only on those folks, many of whom are banned on this thread as well as on other threads but not mine any more. I had to make that choice to balance out between the "right of expression" to "censorship". But if the process of person expressing one's right of expression becomes aggressive and encroaches on the rights of other, then we move against that person in a manner that person moves against others. Again, that is my philosophy. YOurs maybe different. After the 2004 elections, I have realized that you have to meet force with force; the Karl Rove's and all should be handed out their own treatment of others. I am somewhat surprised that all those folks who accuse Bushies of malpractices during the elections have not called for the presence of international observers during the next US elections. Why not? The US has advocated that for other countries. Why not have one for this country instead of accusing others of stealing the elections?