SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (251071)9/12/2005 5:58:22 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570553
 
Ted, Huh? It was a bubble in stocks, not the whole economy.

Huh? The bubble in the stock market propelled the whole economy. What's the difference?


There was a bubble in tech stocks and tech industries.......primarily. That concerned Greenspan and led him to think inflation was just around the corner and he applied the brakes to the economy. Many contend now that was unnecessary; that the bubble in stocks would have worked itself out without interference by Greenspan. Its why many think that was the reason the recession never got that bad.

So sad, you all don't know how to run a country and then you trash the guy who could.

Who said I was trashing Clinton? All I'm saying is that there was a bubble in the late 90's. If you want to credit Clinton for said bubble, you should also fault him for letting it burst like it did.


It wasn't the bursting of the tech bubble that caused the recession.......after all, tech is still a very small part of the economy......sure San Jose, Portland, Seattle and Boston were hurt but that was the extent of the damage from tech and the bubble. It was the application of the interest rate brakes by Greenspan that caused the recession. While connected in one way, they are still two fairly separate issues.

Either that, or you could just give Clinton enough credit to stay out of the way while the bubble inflated.

Clinton did amazing things with the economy. However, there was not much he could do with tech......it was on its own track for several years. It was a special period in an industry that happens when the industry is fairly new but has reached a critical mass. That's why I feel sorry for all those people who continue to invest in tech expecting a repeat of the '90s. Its not likely to happen.

ted



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (251071)9/12/2005 6:54:31 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570553
 
re: Huh? The bubble in the stock market propelled the whole economy. What's the difference?

It would probably be a stretch to say that the low end of the wage scale (poverty) benefited from the tech stock bubble. More likely it was an overall stronger economy, without the (current) large increase in illegals competing for low end jobs. And keeping wages artificially low.

John