SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (67778)9/14/2005 1:26:30 AM
From: JF Quinnelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
PC isn't about the Last Temptation of Christ;

In your opinion. I didn't ask for that, I asked if you would accept the film being banned if someone in power found it bigotry and used PC methods to squelch it- squelching is something you say you support, at least when you get to do the defining. I'm curious to see if you'd support censorship when you don't get to decide what defines bigotry.

you've mixed up so many ideas in your post.

Feel free to point out an example. I don't use the fallacy of the complex question, on the contrary I like Occam's Razor. You have sought to define PC to your own convenience, as dealing with bigotry, profanity, public spaces. Those introductions may please you but they don't deal with political correctness. Perhaps you should read Henthoff's book, and you would learn that PC has been used to prosecute people for private opinions. Which is why liberals like Henthoff find PC dangerous.



To: epicure who wrote (67778)9/14/2005 9:18:21 AM
From: Constant Reader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
is the world better for more people because people are less bigoted than they were? I'd say that's a huge yes.

There is absolutely no evidence that politically correct speech has in any way contributed to a decrease in bigotry. At best, it helps to hide it.