Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dennis Roth who wrote (49144)	9/14/2005 10:17:36 AM
From: ridingycurve	Respond to of 206085

<<However, in fairness to EnCana and XTO, both appear to have better project diversity than EOG.>> Can anyone explain to me why this is important? In my ignorant bliss it seems that a concentration in the Barnett is an advantage rather than a disadvantage, but I proclaim no expertise. I have heard that EOG has more acreage in the Barnett than it can possibly drill in my lifetime. As a side note, my son visited friends on a very large ranch in Hood County over the Labor Day weekend. He said that EOG had prepared a frac pit and that pipe was on site, but don't recall if he said the rig was on site. I know little about the process. Does construction of the frac pit preceded drilling or visa versa? Anyone know the typical TD, formation thickness, etc., in Hood County? Edit: Meant to respond here, but inadvertently responded on the EOG thread on the first try.