SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cfimx who wrote (63286)9/15/2005 8:11:00 AM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
People don't buy on benchmarks, which can be easily manipulated. they buy based on relationships, comfort, easy to buy, road map. i always said sun micro had the best pr team in the business

You can't sell on benchmarks only, but you can't sell when you don't have a prayor on the benchmarks either - which is the situation with Sparc.

Months ago I said this entire AMD thing was pure nonsense and it is, except of course the week they announce it to the world until the BLOGGERS find the next thing to hype to their readers. you can't have LASTING differentiation when you are using off the shelf parts and NOW ots OS.

As if there was an alternative. You can argue hypotheticals, such as what if Sparc development achieved industry leadership? what if customers didn't prefer industry standard servers? what if customers didn't care about price performance? None of these are realistic to expect, therefore Sun needs to go with what is a viable strategy, if Sun wants to stay business of selling server hardware.

Lasting differentiation based on Sparc (and Alpha, Mips, PA-RISC) has come to the end, so Sun needs to build up the differentiation in other areas.

This actually marks the point of no return for sun micro because they finally realized they have to start selling products that people actually want to buy; trouble is they still HAVE to sell products that people don't want ( SPARC and SOlaris) and those bring in a lot more revenue.

Which is one reason I don't own any Sun at this time. Sun can't, overnight, free itself of dependence on Sparc and Solaris, but they certainly are moving it that direction. I think a better argument (against Sun) is the time it takes to get these new lines on the market. In this new (for Sun) competitive market, time to market is very important. HP, for example, has been benefiting from the advantage that dual core Opteron offer in the market from the time these CPUs were introduced (Spring). I believe, after the big announcement, that these new products are not shipping immediately.

Let me get this straight. Sun micro selling sub $1000 servers is a GOOD THING?

If they can make $50 or $100 bucks on them yes. To be fair, sub $1000 is just one configuration of one of the models...

Joe



To: cfimx who wrote (63286)9/15/2005 8:58:31 AM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Unlike most "parties," this one is ongoing. There's no "late," at least not in the long haul. There's just now.

The industry has a long history of "leapfrog," in which one vendor pulls ahead temporarily with a new product until its peers announce _their_ competing new products. Right now it seems to be Sun's turn to be out in front.

JMHO.

Charles Tutt (SM)