SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : momo-T/FIF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fred hayes who wrote (3117)9/15/2005 9:31:42 PM
From: FiloF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12215
 
Along those lines, I was going to name OSCI. I think a problem there (among other problems that I am sure some of the veterans on this board can list) is even if it has the potential for going 5x or more, it could very well get munched at a pretty small premium (2x?).



To: fred hayes who wrote (3117)9/15/2005 9:43:33 PM
From: tom pope  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12215
 
I agree on COR. It's so lethargic it should go on high doses of CX717 to wake up.

I have a large position in COR in terms of shares, but not yet in terms of dollars.



To: fred hayes who wrote (3117)3/7/2006 3:44:54 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12215
 
>>baggers: How about PCOP and COR? <<

Baby steps.

:-)

edit:

finance.yahoo.com



To: fred hayes who wrote (3117)3/30/2006 12:05:11 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Respond to of 12215
 
>> baggers: How about PCOP and COR? <<

Again, a well-timed post. Soon thereafter, pcop was added to "2000".